Talksport

[supercity88]

He does talk shit and it came across as racist in my eyes.
So if I join a private members club and it introduces sex crimes that's perfectly OK as it's a private members club.

He makes the right point but doesn't connect the dots.

At the very start he mentions about Chelsea and Abramovich and there being no governance, and then lessons were learnt and governance came in and evolved. That's all very well and true, if it's done for the reasons of fairness and sporting merit. If he stepped back and wondered who is driving those rules and governance and why, he'd realise that this isn't a case of good vs. evil it's a group of clubs with their own agenda's trying to bring in rules that do as, if not more damage, to the league and sporting principles than what we're looking to challenge.

He's also obsessing over the decision making and suggesting it's this democratic process. When this is a completely rigged process where groups of vested interests united to challenge and discriminate others. And as you say in your example, views of the majority are not always what we want to, or should be defending.

 

[manimanc]

As it happens, I’d say quite a lot of the discourse on a few matters (particularly understanding what the City case really was/is) has come from my content in various places. TS clearly has a big audience (incl of decision makers) so it’s worth doing

Fair enough pal.

 

[HaalandEffect]

 

[Blue Maverick]

He makes the right point but doesn't connect the dots.

At the very start he mentions about Chelsea and Abramovich and there being no governance, and then lessons were learnt and governance came in and evolved. That's all very well and true, if it's done for the reasons of fairness and sporting merit. If he stepped back and wondered who is driving those rules and governance and why, he'd realise that this isn't a case of good vs. evil it's a group of clubs with their own agenda's trying to bring in rules that do as, if not more damage, to the league and sporting principles than what we're looking to challenge.

He's also obsessing over the decision making and suggesting it's this democratic process. When this is a completely rigged process where groups of vested interests united to challenge and discriminate others. And as you say in your example, views of the majority are not always what we want to, or should be defending.

That is a key question, who keeps asking to change the rules? There has to be someone saying it for it to be brought up, it’s not City and I would think the smaller clubs are that far off it’s not of concern to them, so clearly it’s your nearest rivals that are complaining.

 

[billblu]

Did the 20 clubs get to vote for Richard masters to be given the job of ceo in this democracy that is the premier league or did he just do well in the dipper/rag interview? Does anybody know if they voted on this ?

 

[dadnlad]

That is a key question, who keeps asking to change the rules? There has to be someone saying it for it to be brought up, it’s not City and I would think the smaller clubs are that far off it’s not of concern to them, so clearly it’s your nearest rivals that are complaining.

please keep up the rules evolve with time ;)

 

[Grassland Blue]

I had a rag fan come up to me snarling and saying that when CITY lose this challenge against the P/L (and the 115) then we would be kicked out of the league and all the other clubs would be laughing at us.
So I asked him what would happen WHEN we win?
I also pointed out that as things stand CITY haven't been found guilty of anything re the 115 charges unlike the rags who were guilty and only received a relatively small fine.
The look of bafflement on his face was something to behold as he then turned and walked away.

 

[Blue Til Death]

Feel sorry for the Palace fans. Imagine having to live with the fact that at some point in history, that vile creature owned your club. Knowing that at some stage in your football supporting life you actually put money in his pocket. I wouldn't be able to live with myself.

I couldn’t live with myself opening a link with this **** in it..

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

I had a rag fan come up to me snarling and saying that when CITY lose this challenge against the P/L (and the 115) then we would be kicked out of the league and all the other clubs would be laughing at us.
So I asked him what would happen WHEN we win?
I also pointed out that as things stand CITY haven't been found guilty of anything re the 115 charges unlike the rags who were guilty and only received a relatively small fine.
The look of bafflement on his face was something to behold as he then turned and walked away.

A smack in the face to cunts like that is usually more effective than wasting time attempting to educate the braindead fuckers.

 

[Grassland Blue]

A smack in the face to cunts like that is usually more effective than wasting time attempting to educate the braindead fuckers.

Too many witnesses and under camera too.
Restraint was necessary!