squirtyflower said:no it isn'tGelsons Dad said:Soulboy said:I simply must laugh at all the posters on here having a pop at the wages being paid to teachers... the outrageous sum of circa £30,000 a year for one of the most important jobs in a civilised society... and the same people are hankering after footbalers on £100,000 a WEEK, and don't see the irony in their stance!
Footballers deserve whatever they are paid, because we are in a free market.
But the same principle applies to teachers.
If the know-nowts on here think it's easy money and too many holidays, then get off your arses and dump that McDonalds cap, and get yourself a job as a teacher.
It's what the free market is all about.
I don't see the average pay as outrageous, nor do I hanker after footballers.
The strike isn't about pay. It's about pension contributions.
However, UK teachers are well payed in global terms yet ofsted states 1/2 UK schools are failing their students. UK academic standards are average in global terms and poor with regard to poorer families.
Teachers pensions are untenable and disproportionate. The unions fear a more competitive market that realistic public sector pensions will bring which is why they are striking on principle. It's their right to do it and it's the publics right to show their feelings. In the end teachers in the public sector are employees of the state and therefore the tax payer and the tax payer's response to the strike will dictate the governments stance.
teachers pension contributions have been steadily rising since 2007 and are set to continue for the next three years
they are striking because the government want to change the conditions of the pension:
when you can claim it, what percentage you'll get and what kind of salary it will be based on
ps when you gonna get me that NUT flyer?
but all of those without consultation
It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
So many of them certain of their facts, yet so many of them actually clueless.
Thank fuck I didn't go to the schools they went to... ;-))