Tennis Thread

Jannik Sinner is not a drug cheat. Do some research beyond the headlines.

"Sinner twice tested positive for the banned anabolic steroid clostebol"

Surprised the article made this up

I have read the article and don't believe that the physio cut his finger and applied the anabolic steroid to his finger. Than by massaging Sinner passed the steroid into Sinner.
 
Last edited:
Rather convenient that his suspension occurred between Grand Slam tournaments though when others haven’t been so fortunate. Other pros are questioning that.
It's reasonable to ask why the world number one was treated differently to players who have been banned in the past but the point is that the explanation was accepted and he clearly didn't gain any advantage from it.

"Sinner twice tested positive for the banned anabolic steroid clostebol"

Surprised the article made this up

I have read the article and don't believe that the physio cut his finger and applied the anabolic steroid to his finger. Than by massaging Sinner passed the steroid into Sinner.
Fair enough if you don't believe the explanation but the the authorities clearly do and the amount involved is so minimal that it wouldn't have affect his performance anyway. This is not like the cycling scandals that involved systematic doping,

Just look at the way he is playing months later without help from the small amount of cream :)
 
It's reasonable to ask why the world number one was treated differently to players who have been banned in the past but the point is that the explanation was accepted and he clearly didn't gain any advantage from it.


Fair enough if you don't believe the explanation but the the authorities clearly do and the amount involved is so minimal that it wouldn't have affect his performance anyway. This is not like the cycling scandals that involved systematic doping,

Just look at the way he is playing months later without help from the small amount of cream :)

Isn't it ? How do you know tennis hasn't got a drug problem ?
Personally I think there is a problem in football but cycling is the whipping sport on this subject.

Leicester City for example when they won the league. The running states etc the season before and season after have no compression to the winning season. Very odd.
Liverpool to the ability to run like headless chickens for two seasons than drop like a stone on the 3rd season.
Clear dopping cycle.

;)
 
Isn't it ? How do you know tennis hasn't got a drug problem ?
Personally I think there is a problem in football but cycling is the whipping sport on this subject.

Leicester City for example when they won the league. The running states etc the season before and season after have no compression to the winning season. Very odd.
Liverpool to the ability to run like headless chickens for two seasons than drop like a stone on the 3rd season.
Clear dopping cycle.

;)
Don’t Liverpool claim to have some magic elixir?
The best dopes for long lasting energy are black coffee, beetroot juice, and pickle juice. Not all at once.
 
It's reasonable to ask why the world number one was treated differently to players who have been banned in the past but the point is that the explanation was accepted and he clearly didn't gain any advantage from it.


Fair enough if you don't believe the explanation but the the authorities clearly do and the amount involved is so minimal that it wouldn't have affect his performance anyway. This is not like the cycling scandals that involved systematic doping,

Just look at the way he is playing months later without help from the small amount of cream :)
Same as City and the FFP 115
Sinner will say he is innocent and did a deal to take a ban reluctantly between the major events
Otherwise he would’ve fought it harder I guess
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back