An attacker isn't necessarily a striker. Sanchez is an attacker but he's not a striker. Ronaldo is an attacker or a wing, but he's not and never has been a striker, for all Portugal stupidly put him there isolated in the World Cup.LoveCity said:Reason said:Mourinho hasn't decided yet, really, otherwise they would have already bought one.
"In my opinion, and in that of everyone, we are missing one more man, one more attacker." - Mourinho in July
The reason they don't have one is because Santos are being pains with Neymar (their #1 target) and they have us by the balls with Adebayor, who has turned down moves to Zenit and PSG as he only wants Real and Real only want to pay a pittance so are playing us for fools and want to buy him for peanuts (or a straight swap for Albiol).
They value Eto'o at £70m! That's lunacy.Mancio said:MCC said:Maicon + Eto`o for Carlos in 50M swap.
LOL . inter are wanting 20M plus tevez for eto'o.
Mancio come of it, he's 30 years old, Tevez is in his prime has better world wide image rights (money maker) and at least has the possibility of a sell on.Mancio said:MCC said:Maicon + Eto`o for Carlos in 50M swap.
LOL . inter are wanting 20M plus tevez for eto'o.
Fuzzmaster101 said:An attacker isn't necessarily a striker. Sanchez is an attacker but he's not a striker. Ronaldo is an attacker or a wing, but he's not and never has been a striker, for all Portugal stupidly put him there isolated in the World Cup.
The Goat 10 said:Mancio come of it, he's 30 years old, Tevez is in his prime has better world wide image rights (money maker) and at least has the possibility of a sell on.Mancio said:MCC said:Maicon + Eto`o for Carlos in 50M swap.
LOL . inter are wanting 20M plus tevez for eto'o.
I don't disagree with that, I just disagree with you calling Ronaldinho and Ronaldo(the riverdancing ladyboy one not the goofy fat one) Strikers which they most certainly are not.LoveCity said:Fuzzmaster101 said:An attacker isn't necessarily a striker. Sanchez is an attacker but he's not a striker. Ronaldo is an attacker or a wing, but he's not and never has been a striker, for all Portugal stupidly put him there isolated in the World Cup.
But my point once again, using your terminology, is that 3 of our 4 "strikers" can also play as "attackers", hence why Mancini may believe he can balance four. If he didn't think four top forward players would get regular game time, would he go for them? Mancini has not let us down much at all yet and I have a belief that he has a very flexible and dynamic setup planned with four attacking roles (one deeper role like Silva - did you not notice he is played more central and deeper against Inter and tore them to shreds? And he also tried both Weiss and Johnson more centrally in several games).
Mancio said:The Goat 10 said:Mancio come of it, he's 30 years old, Tevez is in his prime has better world wide image rights (money maker) and at least has the possibility of a sell on.Mancio said:LOL . inter are wanting 20M plus tevez for eto'o.
better image than eto'o ? go bed mate , isnt time to joke LOL