IanBishopsHaircut
Well-Known Member
Dubai Blue said:So you'd play with no striker in a crucial Champions League or Premier League game if Aguero, Balo and Dzeko were all unavailable for some reason rather than use the guy we pay 250k a week to?IanBishopsHaircut said:Dubai Blue said:The guy's a Grade A knobhead and needs to be got rid of ASAP.
BUT......................no one is bigger than Manchester City, and that cuts both ways; Manchester City's short-term interests far outweigh the need to prove a point to a stroppy Argentinian twat or to the wider football world as a whole. Therefore, if he's needed, he should be utilised. It would be madness to send ourselves into a self-imposed striker crisis out of sheer bloody mindedness.
We still get rid as soon as we can, but while he's here and being paid a fucking fortune, we should at least have him available to play IF we need him to.
Completely disagree
If we play him it will do more damage to the Manchester City brand than you can imagine
Mancini will look like a fool
And the club will be seen as a soft touch which will escalate into any player who wants to throw his rattle will do so knowing that no matter how much they take the piss we will back down.
The media would also destroy us
We need to make a stand against player power and we are probably the best placed club in the world to do so
If they were the circumstances we were operating under, I couldn't give a shit what the media think. They'd love us to fuck ourselves up like that when deep down they'd know the sensible thing would be to play him.
And the chances of them all being injured at the same time are...
Carlos Tevez needs to be made an example of
Cave in and it sends the completely wrong message to every footballer from grass roots up
This isn't about his ability..this is about making a stand..and the club needs to be strong on this
We can survive without fatboy..we have before and we will in the future..no matter who is 'injured or unavailable'