It's still serious that he refused to do what the manager asked him to do plus what was Tevez talking about after the game that sky keep playing where he says his head was not right to warm up and play! Isn't that evidence enough?
jimbo101 said:I don't think many on here are giving the Board enough credit.
They have played this superbly from the off. Very professional.
All the leaks have come from Joorabchian & his cronies.
There are obviously numerous strands here - wanting to punish Tevez, but not so much as to totally diminish his sell on value.
Also, who ever said the charges would be about refusing to play or warm up?
This is a disciplinary action, a quasi judicial process. The charges were always going to be in lawyer-speak. Refusing to follow managers instructions was always the main charge. No change there.
Some are too quick to jump on the doom & gloom - shot ourselves in the foot brigade.
The midnight meeting at Bobby's house - both TH & DD thought this would blow up in our faces, but it came to nought.
Have faith in the Board, the process & the bigger picture.
bob stockport said:then you get splits and cliches.
bob stockport said:My worry here is that no player (Zabaleta etc) has gone to the disciplinary hearing and confirmed that Tevez refused to play. He clearly refused to warm up AND play. I dont mind Mancini not having Tevez behind him but hope that doesnt spread to any other players - then you get splits and cliches.
moomba said:There must have been some corroboration to charge him with failing to warm up, I think the mirror and sun articles have muddied the water a bit.
Could be that we have enough evidence to charge Tevez for refusing to play, but it's not in our interests to do that.
bob stockport said:My worry here is that no player (Zabaleta etc) has gone to the disciplinary hearing and confirmed that Tevez refused to play. He clearly refused to warm up AND play. I dont mind Mancini not having Tevez behind him but hope that doesnt spread to any other players - then you get splits and cliches.