The Agenda (Merged)

[Henkeman]

Join us my friend, Gordon and Paul the exceptional beacons, riding the waves of the agenda argument, like dolphins porpoising the great oceans, with true style and magnificence.

More like a couple of mackerel nibbling on the turds as they exit the underwater sewage pipe.

I have far too much grace and poise to be a mackerel, there is no way i am a forage fish, i am far too brilliant and unique for such a comparison.

You, however, have all the poise and grace of Heather Mills dancing, with her fake leg missing, after a couple of bottles of Lambrini

Oi, that's my plan of attack for her.

 

[Hoghead]

Just an example of poor workmanship and research due to the demands of continual 24/7 reporting.

It is no different to the ground capacities of stadium caption which was used to provide evidence of an agenda as City were not included.

Like that omission it is simply poor research. Unless it signifies a pro-City bias in the media by distorting our spending to make us look good? Ridiculous? Of course it is but no more than the stadium capacity omission being evidence of an agenda.

More bull shit from you, but it's to be expected
The BT caption of capacities was far from an overworked journalist's omission, unless you're the dickhead who omitted it?

So you think they purposely omitted it? And, if so, for what reason?

The rest I will ignore

Maybe they just don't want to believe that he plays for City.

 

[Paul Lake's Left Knee]

More like a couple of mackerel nibbling on the turds as they exit the underwater sewage pipe.

I have far too much grace and poise to be a mackerel, there is no way i am a forage fish, i am far too brilliant and unique for such a comparison.

You, however, have all the poise and grace of Heather Mills dancing, with her fake leg missing, after a couple of bottles of Lambrini

Oi, that's my plan of attack for her.

Stony is a bit of a girl, I can see why you've used her. I wouldnt attack Stony in such a manner, she tends to fart horrendously when she's had a few.

 

[Henkeman]

I have far too much grace and poise to be a mackerel, there is no way i am a forage fish, i am far too brilliant and unique for such a comparison.

You, however, have all the poise and grace of Heather Mills dancing, with her fake leg missing, after a couple of bottles of Lambrini

Oi, that's my plan of attack for her.

Stony is a bit of a girl, I can see why you've used her. I wouldnt attack Stony in such a manner, she tends to fart horrendously when she's had a few.

Got a solution for that!

 

[franksinatra]

More bull shit from you, but it's to be expected
The BT caption of capacities was far from an overworked journalist's omission, unless you're the dickhead who omitted it?

So you think they purposely omitted it? And, if so, for what reason?

The rest I will ignore

Maybe they just don't want to believe that he plays for City.

It is a tough one to know if you are joking or not.

 

[Bobby Taylor's Pub Team]

I don't get it. Why the hell would they miss him, of all people, out? Bizarre omission.

Was just about to post this, never been done regarding any other club yet they then miss out our most expensive signing.... Amateurs.

Just an example of poor workmanship and research due to the demands of continual 24/7 reporting.

It is no different to the ground capacities of stadium caption which was used to provide evidence of an agenda as City were not included.

Like that omission it is simply poor research. Unless it signifies a pro-City bias in the media by distorting our spending to make us look good? Ridiculous? Of course it is but no more than the stadium capacity omission being evidence of an agenda.

Maybe they think he came from the academy.

They were unusually restrained on the fee for Tevez at 25mill. Usually it's reported it at anything up to 50mill.

I've seen mistakes like this before, not just with City. Much of the time the presenter will correct it or remark on it. I reckon Mike Wedderburn wouldn't have let it go by unnoticed.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Join us my friend, Gordon and Paul the exceptional beacons, riding the waves of the agenda argument, like dolphins porpoising the great oceans, with true style and magnificence.

More like a couple of mackerel nibbling on the turds as they exit the underwater sewage pipe.

I have far too much grace and poise to be a mackerel, there is no way i am a forage fish, i am far too brilliant and unique for such a comparison.

You, however, have all the poise and grace of Heather Mills dancing, with her fake leg missing, after a couple of bottles of Lambrini

stony needs to be careful or he'll be joining the list.

 

[Peter Doherty]

Spot the difference - both BBC headlines:
Luke Shaw: Man Utd sign Southampton defender for £27m

England defender Luke Shaw has joined Manchester United from Southampton for £27m, making him one of the world's most expensive teenagers.

And this:

Man City sign £28m Bony from Swansea
Last updated 1 hour ago


Wilfried Bony has previously played at Issia Wazi, Sparta Prague and Vitesse Arnhem
Manchester City have completed the signing of Swansea City striker Wilfried Bony for £28m.

You just don't get this agenda lark do you?

I think he's referring the fact both deals involve add-ons

Yet they have used the potential full fee for Bony; £28m

Whereas they used the initial fee for Shaw; £27m. When the potential full fee United will pay is £31m.

To be fair to the BBC, Swansea will receive the add-ons whereas Southampton won't.

 

[Hamann Pineapple]

Frank Lampard's controversial move to Manchester City exposes a potential FFP loophole

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-city/11346783/Frank-Lampards-controversial-move-to-Manchester-City-exposes-a-potential-FFP-loophole.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... phole.html</a>

Manchester City to pay Wilfried Bony an extra £20,000 for every game he plays

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jan/14/wilfried-bony-20000-extra-salary-manchester-city?CMP=share_btn_tw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... are_btn_tw</a>

 

[franksinatra]

Was just about to post this, never been done regarding any other club yet they then miss out our most expensive signing.... Amateurs.

Just an example of poor workmanship and research due to the demands of continual 24/7 reporting.

It is no different to the ground capacities of stadium caption which was used to provide evidence of an agenda as City were not included.

Like that omission it is simply poor research. Unless it signifies a pro-City bias in the media by distorting our spending to make us look good? Ridiculous? Of course it is but no more than the stadium capacity omission being evidence of an agenda.

Maybe they think he came from the academy.

They were unusually restrained on the fee for Tevez at 25mill. Usually it's reported it at anything up to 50mill.

I've seen mistakes like this before, not just with City. Much of the time the presenter will correct it or remark on it. I reckon Mike Wedderburn wouldn't have let it go by unnoticed.

Exactly. We may think its specifically affects City but this is only due to the fact we recognise the mistakes/omissions as its our passion and the team we support.

It is only an assumption but Sky/BT probably hire a team of researchers for stuff like this and rightly or wrongly things get missed. To us missing the signing of Aguero or not knowing of the stadium expansion is inexplicable. However to someone who may not be interested in Manchester City primarily, or even Football, and with deadlines to achieve, its not such a glaring omission.