The Agenda (Merged)

[pml79]

Sky now toting up all our spend on strikers since 2008. Never seen them do this before with other clubs

And they missed out sergio

 

[Bobby Taylor's Pub Team]

Sky now toting up all our spend on strikers since 2008. Never seen them do this before with other clubs

And they missed out sergio

I don't get it. Why the hell would they miss him, of all people, out? Bizarre omission.

 

[city saint]

Sky now toting up all our spend on strikers since 2008. Never seen them do this before with other clubs

And they missed out sergio

I don't get it. Why the hell would they miss him, of all people, out? Bizarre omission.

I noticed that the thick twats

 

[inchy14]

Sky now toting up all our spend on strikers since 2008. Never seen them do this before with other clubs

And they missed out sergio

I don't get it. Why the hell would they miss him, of all people, out? Bizarre omission.

Was just about to post this, never been done regarding any other club yet they then miss out our most expensive signing.... Amateurs.

 

[franksinatra]

And they missed out sergio

I don't get it. Why the hell would they miss him, of all people, out? Bizarre omission.

Was just about to post this, never been done regarding any other club yet they then miss out our most expensive signing.... Amateurs.

Just an example of poor workmanship and research due to the demands of continual 24/7 reporting.

It is no different to the ground capacities of stadium caption which was used to provide evidence of an agenda as City were not included.

Like that omission it is simply poor research. Unless it signifies a pro-City bias in the media by distorting our spending to make us look good? Ridiculous? Of course it is but no more than the stadium capacity omission being evidence of an agenda.

 

[stony]

I agree.

And then there's me and you in the middle, Paul; two beacons of reason and temperance.

and modesty GDM, don't forget the modesty.

Join us my friend, Gordon and Paul the exceptional beacons, riding the waves of the agenda argument, like dolphins porpoising the great oceans, with true style and magnificence.

More like a couple of mackerel nibbling on the turds as they exit the underwater sewage pipe.

 

[jrb]

I fully appreciate some of you won't touch this, and I will get banished from BM, but this is an absolute cracker. It's currently only 3 pages long, so it's a quick and hilarious read. TBF some of them have woken up and smelt the Coffee, but the others are still roasting the beans and waiting to grind them.

Enjoy.

Could Manchester City "disappear" in few years? <a class="postlink" href="http://www.redcafe.net/threads/could-manchester-city-disappear-in-few-years.400274/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.redcafe.net/threads/could-ma ... rs.400274/</a>

 

[squirtyflower]

I don't get it. Why the hell would they miss him, of all people, out? Bizarre omission.

Was just about to post this, never been done regarding any other club yet they then miss out our most expensive signing.... Amateurs.

Just an example of poor workmanship and research due to the demands of continual 24/7 reporting.

It is no different to the ground capacities of stadium caption which was used to provide evidence of an agenda as City were not included.

Like that omission it is simply poor research. Unless it signifies a pro-City bias in the media by distorting our spending to make us look good? Ridiculous? Of course it is but no more than the stadium capacity omission being evidence of an agenda.

More bull shit from you, but it's to be expected
The BT caption of capacities was far from an overworked journalist's omission, unless you're the dickhead who omitted it?

 

[franksinatra]

Was just about to post this, never been done regarding any other club yet they then miss out our most expensive signing.... Amateurs.

Just an example of poor workmanship and research due to the demands of continual 24/7 reporting.

It is no different to the ground capacities of stadium caption which was used to provide evidence of an agenda as City were not included.

Like that omission it is simply poor research. Unless it signifies a pro-City bias in the media by distorting our spending to make us look good? Ridiculous? Of course it is but no more than the stadium capacity omission being evidence of an agenda.

More bull shit from you, but it's to be expected
The BT caption of capacities was far from an overworked journalist's omission, unless you're the dickhead who omitted it?

So you think they purposely omitted it? And, if so, for what reason?

The rest I will ignore

 

[Paul Lake's Left Knee]

and modesty GDM, don't forget the modesty.

Join us my friend, Gordon and Paul the exceptional beacons, riding the waves of the agenda argument, like dolphins porpoising the great oceans, with true style and magnificence.

More like a couple of mackerel nibbling on the turds as they exit the underwater sewage pipe.

I have far too much grace and poise to be a mackerel, there is no way i am a forage fish, i am far too brilliant and unique for such a comparison.

You, however, have all the poise and grace of Heather Mills dancing, with her fake leg missing, after a couple of bottles of Lambrini