blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,342
And I’m pretty sure they’d never heard of UFO in 1973 either.Yup, not remotely influenced by Rainbow or VH - FFs Gene Simmons rather famously "discovered" Van Halen.
And I’m pretty sure they’d never heard of UFO in 1973 either.Yup, not remotely influenced by Rainbow or VH - FFs Gene Simmons rather famously "discovered" Van Halen.
Bet they had. I’ve never been a fan of Kiss, remember when they first came out, I was at middle school and a friend was raving on about themAnd I’m pretty sure they’d never heard of UFO in 1973 either.
Hardly anyone in the UK knew UFO pre 74. They toured Germany a lot playing their space rock before recruiting Schenker. Very much doubt 4 New Yorkers knew them and even if they did they’d only know their 2 space rock albums.Bet they had. I’ve never been a fan of Kiss, remember when they first came out, I was at middle school and a friend was raving on about them
Just seems like they were out earlier, I thought they were a great bandHardly anyone in the UK knew UFO pre 74. They toured Germany a lot playing their space rock before recruiting Schenker. Very much doubt 4 New Yorkers knew them and even if they did they’d only know their 2 space rock albums.
They were around from 68 , but they didn’t become the UFO we know until their third album with Schenker, Phenomenon in 74. Agree great band though.Just seems like they were out earlier, I thought they were a great band
True. Ironically considering their show, I find them bland. Uninteresting.To be fair they came before most of those bands and influenced them.
Don’t mean influenced by them. Just a poorer version of them.Yup, not remotely influenced by Rainbow or VH - FFs Gene Simmons rather famously "discovered" Van Halen.
I like a few of their albums thought hey aren't one of my favourite bands but they were influential for many different rock bands, much more than they could be called copyists. They were a unique live band with a great theatrical show and there’s nothing wrong with being showmen. As I say they probably wouldn’t be in my top 50 bands but I think their achievements and influence as are too easily dismissed by many.True. Ironically considering their show, I find them bland. Uninteresting.
No accounting for taste. Eh?
In fairness to @OB1 I will listen again also, although nobody else in the house wants to hear it either. I’ll get a chance on my own and I will turn it up, to see if it makes a difference.They did and I guess they in turn were influenced by the likes of Bowie, Alice Cooper and the New York Dolls. To be honest, I was surprised when I read this album was released in 1975. If I had had to guess it would have been at least 5 years later.
I was 18 when it released. Maybe I was born a music snob because I Really didn’t like them then and I sure haven’t grown into them.
If I am forced to listen to ’Glam Rock’, I would rather listen to an early Queen album. If I want guitar driven rock then I would rather listen to Thin Lizzy or others. I guess if you loved them when you were young then that would be a reason to still listen to them.
I am going to give it more listens as it isn’t fair to score it on the basis of a couple.
I’m not being dismissive. At least I hope not. Many of my contemporaries and mates were into them at the time. They just didn’t do anything for me, musically. I’m not saying they are copyists. The bands I mentioned, I regard as superior in that vein, musically. Maybe not theatrically.I like a few of their albums thought hey aren't one of my favourite bands but they were influential for many different rock bands, much more than they could be called copyists. They were a unique live band with a great theatrical show and there’s nothing wrong with being showmen. As I say they probably wouldn’t be in my top 50 bands but I think their achievements and influence as are too easily dismissed by many.