BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,278
Think you are getting confused with Prince Andrew.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The British Monarchy
- Thread starter west didsblue
- Start date
Think you are getting confused with Prince Andrew.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,278
Amusing as always. Would turn the Royal Family from a blood diamond to a Venezuelan centimo.
Are you saying the Queen ‘finances devastating wars and terrorism’?
Harry and Megan will be a definite upgrade.
Ancient Citizen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 15,711
No, he’s gone forever, these are not far behind.Think you are getting confused with Prince Andrew.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,278
No, he’s gone forever, these are not far behind.
Prince Andrew is dead? Epsteined? Jeez. They kept that quiet. No wonder Liz is in hospital.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
controversial but extremely valuable. Meanwhile the latter are worthless other than to Megan's D-level celebrity aspirations. Give it 5 years for the ABC sitcom "Debacle with the Markles"Are you saying the Queen ‘finances devastating wars and terrorism’?
Harry and Megan will be a definite upgrade.
lefty goldblatt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 5,819
Almost like saying Alardyce would be a good City manager after Pep goes. Thing is, in terms of making the Monarchy fit or relevant for next generation or so, Harry and Megan would be a good call.
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,290
I know they’re not everyone’s cup of tea but FFS. You need to have a break from the Daily Express for your own sake.Lol, those two are about as popular as Jimmy Savile.
I respect the Queen, but I don't respect the idea of the Monarchy.
People sleeping under bridges, and that family have hundreds of rooms and thousands of acres at their disposal.
Just seems wrong.
I assume you live in a one bedroom house?
Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
No, 2 bedrooms, both used.I assume you live in a one bedroom house?
It would be interesting to count up the number of rooms in the many residences that the Royals have at their disposal. maybe a thousand ?
Just a guess.
No, 2 bedrooms, both used.
It would be interesting to count up the number of rooms in the many residences that the Royals have at their disposal. maybe a thousand ?
Just a guess.
There’s probably triple the amount of rooms vacant in hotels in this country.
I have two rooms vacant at my house but I’m not going to let a homeless person sleep in it.
You are attacking in the wrong direction.