Flip that to Corbyn saying something as equally potentially damaging, when he was 19 as he was made PM.I’m as far away from being a fan of Truss as possible but advocating looping her opinion as a 19 year old that she denounced fairly soon after would be equally bad reporting to be fair.
Flip that to Corbyn saying something as equally potentially damaging, when he was 19 as he was made PM.
It would be on every fucking media outlet going. That’s why they win. We think it’s out of order to hold her to account over her 19 year old self. They wouldn’t bat an eye, and it would convince the thick Tory/Brexit voting working class he was the devil incarnate. Even though they didn’t know what incarnate meant and certainly couldn’t spell it.
Depends what you mean by forelock.Do you often have people asking you to tug their forelock?
But, they will let it go. Because. Moron as she is, she is their moron and they will try to protect her. Safe in the knowledge, that too many of the masses love nothing better than to bend over a desk and take it up the arse, because some rich **** has convinced them it’s patriotic and rude not to.But it is on every media outlet going, my issue is with the idea of looping it. I agree with the sentiment you say about Corbyn but then I’d rather they didn’t do that at all, not repeat it for everyone.
I don’t think it’s out of order, I think it was right she was asked about it and to clarify her views on it.
I don't think his Mike is on, you can plainly see him saying something to the slave.Yeah it was an entitled and inpatient waft of the hand but the microphones are already on and everyone seems to be silent waiting for transmission so maybe he just didn’t want to say anything.
If you ever watch livestreams of radio hosts they can do similarly ride looking stuff when trying not to disrupt the broadcast.
That’s actually untrue. Taxes in the pre-civil war days provided plenty of employment. Its intellectually dishonest to suggest otherwise.At least many rich families owned mills and factories, employing thousands poor people and allowing them to buy food and the necessities, even supplying basic housing.
Royalty has always done the opposite, taken taxes for just being in the Palaces etc.
I really don't see how they "make a profit" (unless you believe them that benefit from Royalty)You’ve literally said they do fuck all, it’s been pointed out they make a profit for the country and you say “whoop de do”.
But, they will let it go. Because. Moron as she is, she is their moron and they will try to protect her. Safe in the knowledge, that too many of the masses love nothing better than to bend over a desk and take it up the arse, because some rich **** has convinced them it’s patriotic and rude not to.
What has she done wrong exactly?Just watched the BBC News..... that Megan has got some front going out and meeting the public lol
Surprised no one in the crowd called her out on it.
And the same with Randy Andy showing his face up in Balmoral
Check this out for an example of entitlement. Move it yourself you jumbo eared ****. Fucking appalling.
No need to rewind all the way back to when he was 19 to get clips of Corbyn talking shite. It was every 19 minutes let alone 19 years.Flip that to Corbyn saying something as equally potentially damaging, when he was 19 as he was made PM.
It would be on every fucking media outlet going. That’s why they win. We think it’s out of order to hold her to account over her 19 year old self. They wouldn’t bat an eye, and it would convince the thick Tory/Brexit voting working class he was the devil incarnate. Even though they didn’t know what incarnate meant and certainly couldn’t spell it.
Took some US relatives to Stratford and the wife ignored Shakespeare’s house and took a photo of a Christmas shop across the road. The same person spent two days in Beatrix Potter’s Lake District looking for a Paddington Bear to take home to her grand child. She also asked her husband why he was called Paddington.I really don't see how they "make a profit" (unless you believe them that benefit from Royalty)
Most Yank and Chinese tourists pay for their tour of the UK back in USA to travel companies. They actually don't spend that much in the UK as everything is included, meals, hotels etc. They may buy a pint or two.
And anyway they don't expect to see Royals in person, only the buildings like Westminster, St Pauls, The Tower and historical sites. So they would still come, just like they still go to Paris.
When they go to Stratford they don't expect to see William Shakespeare.
Great post mate.I think you underestimate how much work the Queen would have to have done to have the understanding of all the countries’ laws, customs and political situations when she would meet their presidents, prime ministers and ambassadors. And she was doing that sort of work into her 90s.
Every leader she met spoke very highly of her knowledge and dedication to detail. You wouldn’t get world leaders saying what they have about her this week if she was just someone who showed her face at public events to cut a ribbon (including from Putin). If she was just someone who did that, world leaders would react to her death like that Alan Aprtridge “so what” gif.
She was an important part of many countries gaining their independence during her reign. And then has been a huge figure of the Commonwealth and keeping the Commonwealth going. She got 46 countries to join the Commonwealth during her reign. What other person in history has seen an empire crumble, help in getting countries gain independence from that empire, and then work with nearly 50 independent countries and get them to voluntarily join the old leader of that empire in a multilateral union that benefits all involved in ways from lower trade prices to laws to abide by democracy and avoidance of human right abuses?
It’s daft when people say the Queen did fuck all.
I might work harder day-to-day in my life than she did, but I could live for 1,000 years and not achieve what she did through her work.
But Twitter says that he’s a nasty man, as do the half-wits in here, so he must be.He probably doesn’t want to risk knocking it over and getting ink all over himself.
He also is probably miked up and doesn’t want to risk the sound of banging about being picked up.
Virtually everyone who’s ever met Charles had said what an understanding, approachable and likeable bloke he is. No way in a million years he’s going out of his way to be rude to a member of staff just for a laugh.
And I’m not even really a royalist.
It’s no coincidence that Corgi registration stopped a few years back.What happens to the corgis?
Whereas, in reality, he’s a stressed, tired old man who’s probably gone OTT in fussing about an inkwell being out of place.But Twitter says that he’s a nasty man, as do the half-wits in here, so he must be.
Should be able to pick one up from Harpurhey dogs home once they have been processed (washed, wormed, de-flea'd etc).What happens to the corgis?
I would rather you called out the drip drip of poison from this nations media into the collective ear than having a go at royalty.Take a look around you right now at what has been decided on all our behalf’s about how we can live and what we are allowed to do? It’s over the top bollocks. 10 days? But, only football is cancelled? The only working class game. Strikes being called off because they know the right wing media would use it to have a go.
In my opinion, It’s all designed to condition us into believing we can’t do without Monarchy. To keep us tugging our forelock’s and in our place. Now people can do that, and good luck to them. I prefer to think of that situation as servile. It’s a personal thing. Or am I not allowed to call it nauseating conditioning bollocks.