Be fair. That's the most efficient thing I've heard for a while. They're obviously the natural party of government.Only reason Rishi is in the job is because 1922 committee set the rules on election for min 100 nominations on the basis the new PM would have to be in place before the fiscal statement at the end of the month, thus depriving the members of a vote. Its farcical that now Sunak in situ, the fiscal statement at the end ofthe month is now not important..Tories new Rishi would lose a membership vote versus Mordaunt so engineered a way that Rishi wouldn't have to face them.
Tories knew the Party would look even more helpless with a new leader, new pm without having the backing of majority mp
Can we have less of this affectionate first name stuff please? We had “Boris”, “Trent” and now “Rishi”. These are not national treasures.Only reason Rishi is in the job is because 1922 committee set the rules on election for min 100
nominations on the basis the new PM would have to be in place before the fiscal statement at
the end of the month, thus depriving the members of a vote. Its farcical that now Sunak in situ,
the fiscal statement at the end ofthe month is now not important..Tories new Rishi would lose
a membership vote versus Mordaunt so engineered a way that Rishi wouldn't have to face them.
Tories knew the Party would look even more helpless with a new leader, new pm without having
the backing of majority mp
Agreed, Dave.Can we have less of this affectionate first name stuff please? We had “Boris”, “Trent” and now “Rishi”. These are not national treasures.
That’s never real surely??
Agreed, Dave.
I'm with you DidsiCan we have less of this affectionate first name stuff please? We had “Boris”, “Trent” and now “Rishi”. These are not national treasures.