BrianW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Mar 2006
- Messages
- 5,935
- Team supported
- There's Only One City
Part of the issue is that Government grants to Councils have been cut, cut and cut again. Putting up Council tax to offset this leads to disproportionately high increases. This is because of the gearing of the financial structure. The Government's motive is obvious - fob the blame off onto Councils, especially Labour ones. What it usually leads to is cuts and reduced services. Naturally, this is a recipe for public discontent. People have this funny objection to paying more for less.
A lot of Council spending is simply unappreciated by your average punter. One example is the cost of placing SEN pupils in specialist schools - which are mostly privately run. The fees for some of these kids are unbelievable, but their complex needs cannot be met in any other way. In some cases, Eton would literally be cheaper. I pass lightly over the administration of such placements which is also far more complicated than people realise and open to legal challenge if the parents are not satisfied, as often they aren't. Public sympathy is invariably with the child, which is understandable, but in these situations, the Council cannot win.
Legal fees are astonishingly high too, which is why Councils often give way to developers. It isn't necessarily that they are taking 'brown envelopes' as commonly supposed - it's very often that the cost of fighting a private sector person or company that has large resources (A certain local '**** Group' springs to mind) is too much of a risk.
A lot of Council spending is simply unappreciated by your average punter. One example is the cost of placing SEN pupils in specialist schools - which are mostly privately run. The fees for some of these kids are unbelievable, but their complex needs cannot be met in any other way. In some cases, Eton would literally be cheaper. I pass lightly over the administration of such placements which is also far more complicated than people realise and open to legal challenge if the parents are not satisfied, as often they aren't. Public sympathy is invariably with the child, which is understandable, but in these situations, the Council cannot win.
Legal fees are astonishingly high too, which is why Councils often give way to developers. It isn't necessarily that they are taking 'brown envelopes' as commonly supposed - it's very often that the cost of fighting a private sector person or company that has large resources (A certain local '**** Group' springs to mind) is too much of a risk.