They’re a load of useless wankers with no ideas but the word “fascist” is thrown around willy nilly and dilutes the weight of what that word really means.
The government are shit, obviously. But they’re not a load of fascists.
One definition came up with 14 defining characteristics of fascism. Have a read and see how many of them would apply to someone like Suella Braverman.
1. Powerful and continuing nationalism
2. Distain for the recognition of human rights
3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause
4. Supremacy of the military
5. Rampant sexism (and homophobia)
6. Controlled mass media
7. Obsession with national security
8. Religion and government intertwined
9. Corporate power is protected
10. Labour power is suppressed
11. Distain for intellectuals and the arts
12. Obsession with crime and punishment
13. Rampant cronyism and corruption
14. Fraudulent elections
Now obviously some of those descriptors can only really apply to a government rather than an individual (it's hard for one person to rig an election), and obviously someone's instincts can still be suppressed by the institutions they're operating under (Trump is absolutely a fascist, for example, but one that was thwarted by the institutions of the USA, or has been so far, at least).
But for someone like Braverman, I'd say she definitely hits numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. There haven't succeeded in controlling the mass media, but there have been clear attempts to control both the BBC with their appointments and threats of removing the licence fee, as well as organisations like GB News literally operating as a government mouthpiece.