M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Damocles said:SWP's back said:Where are you getting this 1 in 4 and 3 in 4 from?Damocles said:I've been keeping an eye on this as UKIP could have possibly decided the election. It seems that every new UKIP voter, about 1 in 4 come from Labour and 3 in 4 come from the Tories.
The big googly that could be thrown today is if UKIP had a "shy" voting public like the Tories did in 1992 or they had in the recent by-elections. Seosa posted the idea with the backup, but essentially whilst 15% of the popular vote wins them a Bullseye pen and a choc-ice, if you raise that by a few percentage points then it takes them over the line in various marginals and they could take anywhere up to 20 seats.
This of course would guarantee a Labour victory.
Looks to me like the UKIPs rise coincided with Labour dropping, not the Tories
![]()
There's been a bunch of polls on it directly. Good article on it here:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.may2015.com/ideas/why-winning-back-ukippers-wont-necessarily-save-the-tories/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.may2015.com/ideas/why-winnin ... he-tories/</a>
Seems I got the figure wrong - 3 out of 4 UKIP voters would prefer Con as their second choice and 1/4 Lab. The actual source where they are coming from is 15% Labour, 21% Lib Dem and 63% Tory. That's where I got confused with the 3 out of 4; it's 3 out of 5 are ex-Tory voters but 3 out of 4 would vote Tory in this election as their second choice.
So prospective UKIP voters that are having second thoughts are far more likely to vote Tory than any other party. That's interesting because if enough of them bail out of voting UKIP, it could give the Tories an overall majority after all