The Guardian destroys Ian Wright

[Plodderblue]

What needs saying is that his dopey dad mugged him off when he advised him to sit on Chelsea's bench for 3 years. Cost him 3 years regular football in his prime as well as a place in the 2006 World Cup squad.

 

[Revol]

I didn't read the article in full but a quick skim and it smacks of some cynical Guardianista having a go at our Shauny.

So many things wrong with that. You couldn't give it a full two minutes concentration so read it for what 15 seconds??? 15 Seconds to see some words and then come on here to waste your time and ours to have a pop at the article that you couldn't even be arsed reading?!?? What is the fucking point?

You would have been better served spening an extra minute reading the very well arguged article in the first place as it is absolutely bang on the money whether you like it or not.

And I love SWP (see - look at my username), but the Guardian sums the situation up perfectly here.

Wow, calm down?

It's easy to label him a "money grabber" or whatever, but to be fair it's not like he's the first footballer in history to demand more than what he earns weekly, and I can bet he won't be the last. Just my two cents.

 

[Garry.Cook]

Wrighty has let himself down if this is true. He has shown how 'loyal' he is in the past, by jumping ship and trying to play with the bog boys. He wasn't good enough and was lucky enough to be welcomed back to City with open arms. As if that isn't enough, he thinks his performances since returning warrant payrise?

No effing chance Shauny. Start playing for City like you did for England, keep it consistent and THEN come back asking for more money!

 

[MCFC13]

What needs saying is that his dopey dad mugged him off when he advised him to sit on Chelsea's bench for 3 years. Cost him 3 years regular football in his prime as well as a place in the 2006 World Cup squad.

Spot on, enough said

 

[bornblueegg]

What needs saying is that his dopey dad mugged him off when he advised him to sit on Chelsea's bench for 3 years. Cost him 3 years regular football in his prime as well as a place in the 2006 World Cup squad.

Spot on, enough said

Well said

 

[hertsblue]

This is a guy who quit Match of the day as he wanted to be taken seriously as a presenter and then hosted Gladiators and is now on channel 5.

This is a guy who cost his son a place at the last world cup by urging him to sign for Chelsea and bench warm.

Im sorry but Shaun is on what he is worth. If his contract had 12-18 months left then yes id sit down with him, but it doesnt and does not need to be brought up.
All Shaun needs to do is get into that World Cup Squad and play well for City.

 

[Tell The King]

I wouldn't mind 70 grand a week. I wouldn't even mind 1 grand a week.

 

[mcmanus]

I wouldn't mind 70 grand a week. I wouldn't even mind 1 grand a week.

Do these footballers not see the fucking stupidity of saying £60grand a week isn't enough when lads are skint and jobless. I just despair at it all, I really fucking do. SWP tell your gobshite 'I will disagree with Adrian Durham no matter what just to get paid' Dad to fuck off.

Mugging you off? You are being paid 3 fucking million sterling to play for your so called beloved club and fans, plus sponsorship...... can you not realise how this sounds to an average person?

 

[DTeacher]

Thought just crossed me mind - d'yer think Daniel Sturridge is advising SWP?

Who?
;-)

SWP.

Shaun Wright-Phillips....;o)











Yes...yes...I know !!

 

[mr t]

While the rest of us soldier on through the bad times that is this recession, Ian Wright shows us what we already know - he's a big headed greedy twat of a human being with nothing but his own interests at heart.

Shaun - I scored for England last night - Wright-Phillips should take the money and run - if he or his dad think that he's worth a hundred grand a week fine - let them go and get it somewhere else. He's not that good.