rogdogblue
Well-Known Member
Norfstander says it all.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Guardian destroys Ian Wright
- Thread starter bugsyblue
- Start date
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Surely 'Ian Wright' is cockerney rhyming slang for 'Talk Shite'.
Dead right, good night.Argonaut said:Surely 'Ian Wright' is cockerney rhyming slang for 'Talk Shite'.
If only - I'm on a roll - more drink.
M22_blu
Well-Known Member
I'm sure it'll get sorted, Ian Wrights a prick though making this a bigger issue than it is.
I don't like this swp left city for the money shit though that the guy tried suggesting and a few on here have. Firstly city agreed to sell him, he never handed in a transfer request and at the time he would of bin an absolute idiot to stay at city
I don't like this swp left city for the money shit though that the guy tried suggesting and a few on here have. Firstly city agreed to sell him, he never handed in a transfer request and at the time he would of bin an absolute idiot to stay at city
M22_blu said:I'm sure it'll get sorted, Ian Wrights a prick though making this a bigger issue than it is.
I don't like this swp left city for the money shit though that the guy tried suggesting and a few on here have. Firstly city agreed to sell him, he never handed in a transfer request and at the time he would of bin an absolute idiot to stay at city
Exactly - he was better than us so he moved to Chelsea - moved back when we were equal - now despite Wednesday nights goal he is not worth 100,000 a week.
That's right - 100,000 A WEEK - fuck off you greedy twat - we're not the BBC.
Harold
Well-Known Member
Its a bit rich when he still has two whole years to run at the end of the season to start making noises for more money.
No shouting for more money during the poor lacklustre performances earlier this season. One good game and he's screaming for more cash.
Having said that, its human nature to get pissed off that someone is getting paid more than you and doing a worse job. Whether its twenty quid a week or twenty grand.
Its not that long ago. City desperately needed the money when they sold SWP. We sold him for 21 million bought him back for 8.5. The 21 million was good money at the time. He was pushed. Nothing at all like Sturridge. He made 12 million for the club in that one transaction.
In spite of his father, who is just getting our backs up. Tie it into bonuses, so he can't just coast, but give him the cash.
No shouting for more money during the poor lacklustre performances earlier this season. One good game and he's screaming for more cash.
Having said that, its human nature to get pissed off that someone is getting paid more than you and doing a worse job. Whether its twenty quid a week or twenty grand.
Its not that long ago. City desperately needed the money when they sold SWP. We sold him for 21 million bought him back for 8.5. The 21 million was good money at the time. He was pushed. Nothing at all like Sturridge. He made 12 million for the club in that one transaction.
In spite of his father, who is just getting our backs up. Tie it into bonuses, so he can't just coast, but give him the cash.
BlueMooney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 May 2008
- Messages
- 2,036
JOGAMIGMOG said:tolmie's hairdoo said:So Platt Lane is a district now, is it?
Once again this clown kids on he knows what he is talking about.
Platt Lane, funnily enough, it just a lane, simple as.
The district is Fallowfield.
Quality article. The Journo was obviously paraphrasing when he referred to Platt Lane as a 'district'; It's sometimes simpler and gets the point across.
Totally agree 100% with the Journo. I'd love it if we told Wright to fuck off and if Shaun's not happy on 70k per week tell him to whilst we're at it.
He didn't refer to it as a district...
"Platt Lane is in one of Manchester's more unloved districts."