Why do any of you care? Seriously, who gives a shit about the private lives of these people? It's just celeb gossip soap opera nonsense with bells on.
And I'm not talking about the serious stuff, I'm talking about how anyone could argue about how they conduct themselves in public and what they do with their spare time. It's weird.
Yes, I spotted that, so there is an outright lie straight away, what she claimed was immediately debunked by a Royal commentator. She said that the rules had been changed because of her child, which is errant nonsense and was another of her hand grenades intending to disparage. This is the first falsehood, wait for the others to emerge, and they will.We know she’s lying about the refusal of granting Archie the title of Prince.
The rules are Great grand children of a living monarch have NEVER been Princes or HRH. That was codified in 1917 with the founding of the House of Windsor. Cameron’s government updated it before the birth of Prince George so that the children of the heir to the Prince of Wales would be HRH, and all future royals would succeed in birth order irrespective of gender.
Archie will become HRH/Prince on the death of the Queen, assuming Charles becomes King.
It’s not a myth at all. The Mail’s coverage of Markle, as an example, has been an ongoing racist disgrace for more than 2 years. Article after poisonous article, day after day after day. I’ve genuinely never seen anything like it. Utterly reprehensible journalism from a bunch of cnuts, just to encourage clicks and ever more spiteful comments from its bigoted readershipNo, they haven't, that's a complete myth, check out the papers at the time of the wedding, and before it. That's all papers, of all political colours.
Massive if true.Did she mention she also has a City Bingo card?
Vile woman.
To be fair, they said it was intrusion into their private lives that helped them arrive at their decision to quit the Royal Family.
Hardly a private life when you are doing sit downs with Oprah and doing deals with Netflix.
Why keep reading it then? I don't go looking for celeb, royal or celeb royal gossip and never see anything.It’s not a myth at all. The Mail’s coverage of Markle, as an example, has been an ongoing racist disgrace for more than 2 years. Article after poisonous article, day after day after day. I’ve genuinely never seen anything like it. Utterly reprehensible journalism from a bunch of cnuts, just to encourage clicks and ever more spiteful comments from its bigoted readership
Why keep reading it then? I don't go looking for celeb, royal or celeb royal gossip and never see anything.
Another is she got married 3 days before the official one. Just the two of them and the Archbishop. You need to marry in public and have witnesses in the uk so I think she’ll find it was just a rehearsal lolYes, I spotted that, so there is an outright lie straight away, what she claimed was immediately debunked by a Royal commentator. She said that the rules had been changed because of her child, which is errant nonsense and was another of her hand grenades intending to disparage. This is the first falsehood, wait for the others to emerge, and they will.