The Harry and Meghan fuss

As a fictional book that supports some weird conspiracy theory then it might be a good book.
A bit like the Da Vinci Code. Similarly unbelievable, but with a more simplistic central character.

The Da Vinci Code reportedly sold 80 million copies, which just goes to show how many gullible sorts there are out there, ready to tip up their money.
 
Not sure they can be that good when on late show Harry was saying was shocked by fallout from his 25 claim and that the press took it out of context when they’d quoted the passage directly from the book. Perhaps the ghostwriter got it wrong. Someone new to blame…
Passage not the whole chapter putting it in clear context , have you read that chapter or indeed any of it ?
 
We will never know the whole truth.

What I can say, without doubt, is that this book, whatever its flaws may be, is at least as reliable as the shite you read in the Daily Mail and its ilk.

People accept the press has an agenda with regard to City. They have an agenda with anything the public is interested in. The popular image of the royal family is airbrushed and utterly unreliable. It is in fact, an image. Not reality. It is very singular that the press wants us to believe 'William' and 'Kate' are like well-dressed editions of Mother Theresa. At the same time, Harry and Meghan are worse than a thousand Hitlers. I. Just. Don't. Buy. It. Nothing is ever that simple. We are being played.
 
Lots of newspapers kicking the couple as if they liked any of the book they would lose all the briefings and sources , whatever they call themselves and of course they cant look at themselves and say we are cunts
 
A bit like the Da Vinci Code. Similarly unbelievable, but with a more simplistic central character.

The Da Vinci Code reportedly sold 80 million copies, which just goes to show how many gullible sorts there are out there, ready to tip up their money.
That’s the novel, The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown is it?
A easy reading piece of fast paced fiction that was entertaining.
 
Last edited:
The scale, venom, and repetition of articles about Harry and Meghan, show the desperation of the British press to maintain their cash cow - the monarchy. If anything, the number of attacks on Harry (but don't mention the sales or viewing figures) show that there is a clear relationship between the press and the palace, and it is one of information exchange for clicks and relevance.
 
The inconvenient truth behind “his truth”.

He accuses people of saying things yet admits to not remembering dialogue verbatim. It’s a good job he had a ghost writer to sex it up.

Still, at least I can take what he says about the carpets and furniture for granted and as gospel.

The tea stain in chapter 7 was most upsetting.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.