The Harry and Meghan fuss

smudgedj said:
He’ll have to resign now- can’t contradict sparkles version of the truth.
Click to expand...

He hasn't...


Of all the stupid things to come out of this interview I dont think anything is more dumb than twats trying to pretend they caught Markle in a lie over this private ceremony.

No one said it was an official ceremony. No one.

Its just tabloids inventing a controversy and people swallowing it.
 
domalino said:
He hasn't...


Of all the stupid things to come out of this interview I dont think anything is more dumb than twats trying to pretend they caught Markle in a lie over this private ceremony.

No one said it was an official ceremony. No one.

Its just tabloids inventing a controversy and people swallowing it.
Click to expand...
“Three days before our wedding we got married. Just the three of us,” said Meghan.

Not really stupid when someone says they got married three days before the public wedding to question that something is amiss. At the time of the interview I think she really thought that it was official, and even believed the date on the certificate from the private ceremony - which she kept on display - proved it. She probably knows now it was an incorrect belief, but the fact that she was admitting to a deception of the public and that others were in on it, despite it proving not to be, is a real issue. And of course she was admitting to it in order to belittle the Royal Family by portraying that she was in control, not anyone else.
 
Citizen of Legoland said:
“Three days before our wedding we got married. Just the three of us,” said Meghan.

Not really stupid when someone says they got married three days before the public wedding to question that something is amiss. At the time of the interview I think she really thought that it was official, and even believed the date on the certificate from the private ceremony - which she kept on display - proved it. She probably knows now it was an incorrect belief, but the fact that she was admitting to a deception of the public and that others were in on it, despite it proving not to be, is a real issue. And of course she was admitting to it in order to belittle the Royal Family by portraying that she was in control, not anyone else.
Click to expand...

She didn't say it was an official wedding, and anyone smarter than a 4 year old knows you can't get married without witnesses, so if you thought it was an official wedding then you're an idiot, or worse, pretending to be stupid so you can be outraged.

If I say I'm flying to Spain, I shouldn't have to spell out the fact I'm getting on a plane and not flapping a pair of wings.
 
domalino said:
She didn't say it was an official wedding, and anyone smarter than a 4 year old knows you can't get married without witnesses, so if you thought it was an official wedding then you're an idiot, or worse, pretending to be stupid so you can be outraged.

If I say I'm flying to Spain, I shouldn't have to spell out the fact I'm getting on a plane and not flapping a pair of wings.
Click to expand...
She obviously didn't know what the word "marriage" meant - as in "we got married" - or wasn't clear that she was only using it to describe the unofficial ceremony in an emotive manner (in that she wanted to discount the official ceremony), because the word means the formally recognised and legal union of two people.

I'm not trying to display any outrage, but if you're going to drag in innocent people and diminish another country's institutions you have to get your facts and wording very clear. You want to dismiss it as media talk but I think it is something that needed clarifying as it came across, rightly or wrongly, that they duped the people.

I can see they are two very hurt individuals. I'm really not taking sides here, but she said it to embarrass the palace in my opinion.
 
Citizen of Legoland said:
She obviously didn't know what the word "marriage" meant - as in "we got married" - or wasn't clear that she was only using it to describe the unofficial ceremony in an emotive manner (in that she wanted to discount the official ceremony), because the word means the formally recognised and legal union of two people.

I'm not trying to display any outrage, but if you're going to drag in innocent people and diminish another country's institutions you have to get your facts and wording very clear. You want to dismiss it as media talk but I think it is something that needed clarifying as it came across, rightly or wrongly, that they duped the people.

I can see they are two very hurt individuals. I'm really not taking sides here, but she said it to embarrass the palace in my opinion.
Click to expand...
She said it to oprah whilst the three of them weretogether out with chickens and harry didnt correct her . I think they said their vows but it wasnt official as in signed till the big wedding , strange to say she was hitting out at the palace
 
The Telegraph has just put an article up detailing how Haz n Megz were in negotiations with Quibi, a YouTube rival start up, for a year before they fucked off to the States so their claims that they were forced out with no plan is yet more self serving shite.
 
Piers morgan is going on fox news tonite continuing to slag off meghan , i worry for his mental health in regards to her or i would if he wasnt an obnoxious look at me ****
 
kaz7 said:
Piers morgan is going on fox news tonite continuing to slag off meghan , i worry for his mental health in regards to her or i would if he wasnt an obnoxious look at me ****
Click to expand...
He will be fine with or without your concern Kaz.

Rightly or wrongly many a producer wants to hire him.

Looking to do another series of interviewing serial murderers for Crime and Investigation in the US.

As long as Meghan isn't on the list you can rest easy (LOL).
 
for how inappropriate I found Meghan and Harry's behaviour, the fact that Piers Morgan ended up on Tucker Carlson says it all. There's no way back to human decency with a stunt like that, even though he was irredeemable before then.
 
PannickAtTheDisco said:
for how inappropriate I found Meghan and Harry's behaviour, the fact that Piers Morgan ended up on Tucker Carlson says it all. There's no way back to human decency with a stunt like that, even though he was irredeemable before then.
Click to expand...
Tbh mate the world would be a better place if we all ignored Harry, Meghan and Piers.
 
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese said:
Tbh mate the world would be a better place if we all ignored Harry, Meghan and Piers.
Click to expand...

Harry and Meghan seem to be doing a lot of work with charities and mental health and keeping a low profile aside from one interview to give their side of the story after years of media abuse.

Piers Morgan seems to be in a permanent obsessed state of anger against Meghan.

so I think it’s just the latter that needs to be ignored
 
Piers ranted and ranted, for weeks, until he was rightly called out. He then flounced and now rants and rants, daily, about the same stuff. He represents the 'outraged of Britain' very well but what creates that outrage is very dubious indeed, in my opinion.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Harry and Meghan seem to be doing a lot of work with charities and mental health and keeping a low profile aside from one interview to give their side of the story after years of media abuse.

Piers Morgan seems to be in a permanent obsessed state of anger against Meghan.

so I think it’s just the latter that needs to be ignored
Click to expand...
You'd be better off ignoring that particular poster. He says the same thing about everything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top