kaz7
Well-Known Member
exactly this
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Harry and Meghan fuss
- Thread starter Rascal
- Start date
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Crusty former royal aids and secretaries who should be retired coming out with anti megan stuff , a vile attack dog saying she proves having a baby shower she just wanted to be a celeb , she was acting and would like to be a kardashian , fuck me , phil and holly giving him stick, charles biographer , ****
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
That would be specieist.If it was William saying at least it won't be a pasty ginger **** like you would that be racist?
Nightmare Walking
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 May 2014
- Messages
- 4,366
The key question is why exactly have they given this interview? They have not done it just because they wanted to have a chat and a brew.
Now if they have done it as a publicity stunt and to ultimately earn themselves money, then everything they say should be taken with a pinch of salt as they are only going to say what benefits themselves.
If they have done it to highlight mental health, bullying and racism then fair play to them, they should be lauded. You have to be a little concerned though that they are not prepared to act against any racism they have suffered, but seem happy to cast aspersions against a whole institution.
One thing is certain, they have not done this interview because they were bored. It is also worrying that a couple who wanted to get away from the limelight have chosen to do one of the most high profile interviews in history. Something does not add up here.
Now if they have done it as a publicity stunt and to ultimately earn themselves money, then everything they say should be taken with a pinch of salt as they are only going to say what benefits themselves.
If they have done it to highlight mental health, bullying and racism then fair play to them, they should be lauded. You have to be a little concerned though that they are not prepared to act against any racism they have suffered, but seem happy to cast aspersions against a whole institution.
One thing is certain, they have not done this interview because they were bored. It is also worrying that a couple who wanted to get away from the limelight have chosen to do one of the most high profile interviews in history. Something does not add up here.
Hart of the Matter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 5,180
Do you know they didn't act against or call out the racism at the time?The key question is why exactly have they given this interview? They have not done it just because they wanted to have a chat and a brew.
Now if they have done it as a publicity stunt and to ultimately earn themselves money, then everything they say should be taken with a pinch of salt as they are only going to say what benefits themselves.
If they have done it to highlight mental health, bullying and racism then fair play to them, they should be lauded. You have to be a little concerned though that they are not prepared to act against any racism they have suffered, but seem happy to cast aspersions against a whole institution.
One thing is certain, they have not done this interview because they were bored. It is also worrying that a couple who wanted to get away from the limelight have chosen to do one of the most high profile interviews in history. Something does not add up here.
How you do that in a family context is very different to how it happens in the work place.
abu13
Well-Known Member
After watching GMTV this morning i have to say Piers Morgan is a bit of a ****.
M
M
manchester blue
Guest
Are they refunding tax payers for their wedding yet?
Just seen Morgan's stunt. I assume it was a stunt if not it proves what I have always thought about him.
Imagine if Helen Wateley had stormed off when he was bullying her in an interview. Typical ****, can give it out but one minute in he's had a hissy fit.
Just seen Morgan's stunt. I assume it was a stunt if not it proves what I have always thought about him.
Imagine if Helen Wateley had stormed off when he was bullying her in an interview. Typical ****, can give it out but one minute in he's had a hissy fit.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Crusty former royal aids and secretaries who should be retired coming out with anti megan stuff , a vile attack dog saying she proves having a baby shower she just wanted to be a celeb , she was acting and would like to be a kardashian , fuck me , phil and holly giving him stick, charles biographer , ****
didn't the lover of a certain PM have a baby shower at the start of lockdown? Is Carrie just a would be celeb?
Nightmare Walking
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 May 2014
- Messages
- 4,366
I have no idea whether they acted against it at the time. Now I may be making a wild assumption here, but I reckon if they had acted against it previously, they would have mentioned it in the interview.Do you know they didn't act against or call out the racism at the time?
How you do that in a family context is very different to how it happens in the work place.
Most families would deal with racism internally. It is these 2 who have made it public. If you make it public then you have to deal with the ramifications. This is not any other family, if it was, they would not be doing this interview in the first place.
Do they want to make a stand against racism or are they using a vague and out of context aspersion of it for their own financial gain.
We basically have a member of the royal family accusing another member of the royal family of racism. This is a big deal, even more so in the current climate, where we are fighting against racism. If a member of the royal family is racist and is making racist remarks, it should be dealt with. If Harry is talking shit then he should be castigated.