CelesteItis
Well-Known Member
FOYS! you racist cúnts you!
Yes, like the rags did at Sunderland in 2012. Oh, hang on........Wouldn't happen. Unless it's won away from home on the last day of the season they always present the trophy at the next home game.
You did not get the point - Kane and Lukaku are in same category, you can call it elite because of Kane or whatever else you please.Elite and Lukaku in the same sentence. Not sure you'll get many takers.
Kane as top striker - sure same top as Lukaku, only difference one is English.Absolutely not same category as Lukaku, way better, but as bad as Lukaku is in some big games and as much as I don't find him elite one, regular 20+ goals strikers are not found in the wood though and if Rags get 20+ goals from him, they'll be and should be happy. He might not get them all the glory and they micht need something to supplement but 20+ goals is never bad buy.
Back on Kane, It's stupid really to not rate Kane as top, top striker, it really is, it's bitterness because he plays for another club, if he'd play for us, everybody would say he's top of the world. He's universally rated as one of the best young attackers in the world, there's no doubt about it.
Aguero and him - obviously Aguero from 5 years ago was at level Kane is not naturally talented for and never would reach, but from several reasons, including their ages and the influence they both have in their respective teams, if I'd be let's say Everton manager, without any emotional connections to either and had a pick of two, I'd pick Kane now without a doubt.
They're not going to let an English club move to La Liga, stop being silly.as I just wrote it in PL games thread, he's a monster of the striker and at age of 24 easily the 100+ million player. Yes, I think he's better than Aguero currently and would be obvious choice between two, based on their age etc. for any club in the world.
He's 24 and already has 93 Premier League goals, at this rate even Shearer's record is not safe if he doesn't fuck off to La Liga. stop being fucking bitters and accept that he's world class striker and proved himself year after year.
They're not going to let an English club move to La Liga, stop being silly.
as I just wrote it in PL games thread, he's a monster of the striker and at age of 24 easily the 100+ million player. Yes, I think he's better than Aguero currently and would be obvious choice between two, based on their age etc. for any club in the world.
He's 24 and already has 93 Premier League goals, at this rate even Shearer's record is not safe if he doesn't fuck off to La Liga. stop being fucking bitters and accept that he's world class striker and proved himself year after year.
He’s only good because ‘he shoots alot’ apparently
Also unlike any of the above, the team is built to his strengths and to his benefit at the cost of others.no, he's good, but again today, 8 shots, 3 goals. Has now scored 15 from 108 shots, Salah has 15 from 71, Aguero has 12 from 54 and Sterling has 12 from 46.
So he's not prolific, he's not world class and certainly not in the top 5 players in the world. He just gets to shoot at the expense of the team whenever he feels like it so he's bound to score more goals by sheer odds.
no, he's good, but again today, 8 shots, 3 goals. Has now scored 15 from 108 shots, Salah has 15 from 71, Aguero has 12 from 54 and Sterling has 12 from 46.
So he's not prolific, he's not world class and certainly not in the top 5 players in the world. He just gets to shoot at the expense of the team whenever he feels like it so he's bound to score more goals by sheer odds.
If he was at City he'd be sitting in the fucking stands until he learned to play for the team and stop handing possession to the other team pretending to be Roy of the Rovers.But he’s not getting backed up by the likes of Silva, De Bruyne and the ridicolous amount of talent you have - if he played for City I bet his strike ratio would be a hell of a lot better because he would be getting goals on a plate much like Aguero does, instead Kane often has to use his strength and power, beat players and take on shots with little support.
He’s the closest striker to Shearer that I’ve seen and that’s one of the highest compliments I can give.
If he was at City he'd be sitting in the fucking stands until he learned to play for the team and stop handing possession to the other team pretending to be Roy of the Rovers.
Aguero sat in the stands whenever Jesus was fit, until he learned. His goalscoring has dropped as a result, but the fucking teams has gone up.Yeh. Sure.
He’s a greed f*cker and always looks to score. Same as Aguero and the majority of world class strikers.
Better than Aguero? Behave. He’s a top striker but not in Aguero’s class.as I just wrote it in PL games thread, he's a monster of the striker and at age of 24 easily the 100+ million player. Yes, I think he's better than Aguero currently and would be obvious choice between two, based on their age etc. for any club in the world.
He's 24 and already has 93 Premier League goals, at this rate even Shearer's record is not safe if he doesn't fuck off to La Liga. stop being fucking bitters and accept that he's world class striker and proved himself year after year.
But he’s not getting backed up by the likes of Silva, De Bruyne and the ridicolous amount of talent you have - if he played for City I bet his strike ratio would be a hell of a lot better because he would be getting goals on a plate much like Aguero does, instead Kane often has to use his strength and power, beat players and take on shots with little support.
He’s the closest striker to Shearer that I’ve seen and that’s one of the highest compliments I can give.