In order to frame a completely erroneous argument it is important to set the boundaries of what is and what is not acceptable discourse, never address your adversary directly, never veer anywhere near the point and pepper your "argument" with highly charged but completely irrelevant words and phrases.
So what do we have here on the question of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party?
Blimey! It's nearly the full set...
Auschwitz
stormtroopers
gas chambers
The working definition of anti-Semitism drawn up by the
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, contains the following....
"Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust."
While that does not state that accusing Jewish people of using the holocaust as a political tool is anti-Semitic in itself, I've seen that viewpoint used as an anti-Semitic indicator in a number of social attitude polls. So accusing a Jewish person of doing that might be considered anti-Semitic.
So I won't.
What I find particularly depressing about you is that you're not an idiot and yet you feel perfectly relaxed to use references to Auschwitz, storm troopers and gas chambers in reference to the Labour Party and, more depressing still, you are happy to end your post thus....
"you and your ilk?"
Imagine how your head would explode if I were to refer to you as "you and your ilk?"
I never would refer to you in such a way, not because I self censor or lie, but because I don't feel that way and never have and neither do the rest of my "ilk"