The Labour Government

[Rascal]

Why were we then known as the sick man of Europe during the time you refer to?

Have you heard of Edward Heath? he tried to introduce an incomes policy that failed spectacularly and led to huge industrial unrest, We were the sick man of Europe because of Heaths stuoidity, read up on it. he was a fucking idiot,

 

[Rascal]

You are just a faux communist who constantly spouts ideological bullshit and calls everyone a ****. Get in the bin.

thanks for your kind words

Love that you call me a "faux communist" I am probably more influenced by Kropotkin than Marks, more Lenin than Trotsky, i am not a Stalinist, Gramsci intrigues me, not read much though.

What you have to remember is there are differences as the left always argues over small details.

Marxism believes in the public ownership of the means of production, whilst Communism believes in the collective ownership of the means of production. Can you see the difference?

Lenin though was quite comfortable with small business as they should remain outside of state control.

Trotsky s ideas were of perpertual revolution until the world was socialist.

You my friend are obviously a Capitalist, which makes yo a supporter of the most murderous ideology than mankind has ever seen.

Bless you x

 

[bluethrunthru]

Three weeks ago they were telling us Labour don't have a plan

 

[Don Karleone]

If the Tories did what Cooper is proposing you would (rightly) be losing your shit.

 

[Hertzblue]

 

[Brewster's millions]

Why would that happen when the state sector has more spare places than the entire private sector?

Most non-partisan experts think that the numbers leaving will be fairly small, but even a dramatic exodus, of 20% of all private pupils, wouldn't even make a dent in the state sector.

Has any detailed planning / analysis been conducted on which parts of the country and indeed individual councils are most likely to see private school pupils moving to the state sector, and whether the state sector in those particular areas could absorb this increase in numbers?

Talking about spare capacity in the state sector as a whole is a non-argument if the movement is likely to be concentrated in particular regions.

 

[meltonblue]

If the Tories did what Cooper is proposing you would (rightly) be losing your shit.

Is that targeted at an individual? As I don’t think there’s many people that wouldn’t agree that anyone with failed asylum should
be either staying or working here illegally.

 

[Don Karleone]

Is that targeted at an individual? As I don’t think there’s many people that wouldn’t agree that anyone with failed asylum should
be either staying or working here illegally.

Yeah, it is. It's targeted towards all those who hated how the Tories handled immigration and are now cheering something that Braverman herself could've said.

 

[Postman Pep]

Three weeks ago they were telling us Labour don't have a plan

Look at you celebrating the home secretary getting a positive write up the Sun ..... deary fucking me.

 

[meltonblue]

Yeah, it is. It's targeted towards all those who hated how the Tories handled immigration and are now cheering something that Braverman herself could've said.

Really? As that doesn’t make much sense at all to me. Braverman didn’t care if they were failed asylum seekers or not, she didn’t want them getting here in the first place and her and all the other Home Secretaries under the tories failed to sort out the processing to know if they had acceptable reasons for asylum or not. Even worse than that though, even if they were successful, they wanted to subsequently shift them off to Rwanda.

How’s that comparable to ensuring failed asylum seekers aren’t staying and working here illegally? The key bit there being their application being processed and assessed whether they are eligible or not. For any whose application was accepted, there’s no suggestion of doing anything. There’s no hypocrisy or party political bollocks there, it’s a rational position for people to take.