TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 23,327
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Elon working on it for his tech bro Rishi.Do they do any in Maggie flavour?
Elon working on it for his tech bro Rishi.Do they do any in Maggie flavour?
They have chosen not to, because it was clear as day that they haven’t had chance to look at where they can fund it from. It was specifically left out of the manifesto with Starmer stating that he wanted to reverse it but didn’t know how to fund it.There are plenty of ways to fund it, they're choosing not to.
![]()
They have chosen not to, because it was clear as day that they haven’t had chance to look at where they can fund it from. It was specifically left out of the manifesto with Starmer stating that he wanted to reverse it but didn’t know how to fund it.
As for the political gain, they’ve brought this to see how weak the leadership is by using an emotive subject to test them, just like you are using it to attack the centre of the party.
What’s your thoughts on Rayner and many of the left of the party voting to retain it, are they cunts as well or are they toeing the party line and allowing the party to bring a proper policy to the country that will eradicate the shitshow that we see now.
Go away with all this "they can't fund it" bollocks. Plenty of money for other stuff but not for something that will make an actual difference.
If you voted against the amendment or abstained without a valid reason, you're a ****. That's my thoughts.
So, that’s most of them on the left of the party.Go away with all this "they can't fund it" bollocks. Plenty of money for other stuff but not for something that will make an actual difference.
If you voted against the amendment or abstained without a valid reason, you're a ****. That's my thoughts.
Well, this is a bad policy, isn't it? 'Incentives' are for the rich and greedy.Interestingly they might give teachers a bigger pay rise than 5.5% as part of reformation of schools and education curriculum policy.
They are looking for incentives to retain teachers as well as encourage new people into the role.
So they should just click there fingers and say yes to 3.4 billion a year just like that when they’ve only been in power a few weeks ?
Soon as there’s a whiff of a tax rise the same Karleone anger will be shown all over the country.
He was never going to lose the vote so we can disregard that bit and that fiscal competence defence doesn't really stack up. It costs the equivalent of the recent annual pledge to Ukraine, where fiscal justification is not even remotely part of the debate.Fiscal competence. If he had lost the vote, what Reeves had been put in place on the messaging if fiscal competence would have been undermined.
It needs to go, but they need to find a credible way to "fund it".