Confusing the biggest mistake the country made with the biggest mistake the Tory party made.
Just read the post that evoked this response from you and am laughing my head off. Wanting to see people from ordinary backgrounds succeed and represent us is "extreme left"? You're such a bootlicker lol.
It's easy to forget that one of the big operational issues with the previous government was because of ideological warfare and factionalism they destroyed any semblance of a talent pool to pick from. Jones was the chair of the business and trade select commitee so he isn't coming at things cold which seems to have been the case too often previously with ministers clueless about their briefs.
It will just be refreshing to have people focusing on governing instead of tearing each other apart (I hope).
What happened to that little Tory Penfold character, I can’t remember his name but he was one of those right wingers holding the government at knifepoint a lot of the time, has he fucked off now?
Or maybe she was just so good in them that once she’d fixed one they moved her on to another to fix that too.You just have to hope that we get some stability with the various roles.
In the ten years before becoming PM, Liz Truss had 6 different Ministerial roles in Education, Environment, Justice, The Treasury, International Trade, and finally the Foreign Office. Schapps had Transport, Home Sec, Business, Energy, and Defence in the last Parliament alone.
Constant rotation to mostly unrelated roles. Is it any wonder that fuck all got done?
Mark Francois kept his safe seat with a reduced majority.
I'm an "extreme lefty" too, apparently!
Setting a target to build 1.5 million homes in this parliament and by changing planning so that the green belt can be built on (some always has ) by designating as Grey belt ( what ever that is) they will find that the nimbys & the eco/greens will tie up the courts and use direct action to try & stop these developments.
You just have to hope that we get some stability with the various roles.
In the ten years before becoming PM, Liz Truss had 6 different Ministerial roles in Education, Environment, Justice, The Treasury, International Trade, and finally the Foreign Office. Schapps had Transport, Home Sec, Business, Energy, and Defence in the last Parliament alone.
Constant rotation to mostly unrelated roles. Is it any wonder that fuck all got done?
Every developed country has problems with house prices, that aside I would support this is the houses being built were all social housing because otherwise those houses will be snapped up before long and straight into landlords pockets.
Yeah Vic no one knew things grow with immigration, thanks for that.In short, either we have an ageing population with more care needs and triple-locked pensions to be paid for by a diminishing workforce, or we allow immigration. Call the latter a pyramid scheme if you want, but it's how the cities have grown - from the industrial revolution drawing people to the North, to mechanisation killing rural jobs. My grandfather and his brother "left the land" and migrated to the North - and started a building firm (so provided more infrastructure than they used).
And I've cited umpteen times that immigration often means wealth-building innovation. Just in this region: Beyer-Peacock, Renold Chains, ICI, Ferranti. Even in retail: M&S, and where would Macclesfield be without Arighi-Bianci?
Living longer and old-age dependency – what does the future hold? - Office for National Statistics
Examining the relationship between population ageing, economic dependency and international migration in the UK.www.ons.gov.uk
House builders share prices have all gone up this morning, so I guess the majority won't be social housingEvery developed country has problems with house prices, that aside I would support this if the houses being built were all social housing because otherwise those houses will be snapped up before long and straight into landlords pockets.
House builders share prices have all gone up this morning, so I guess the majority won't be social housing
I wouldn't defend his politics because he is just dead wrong imho but comparing a speech with a post on a forum is a tad silly.The point is your posts are barely intelligible compared to Angela Rayner’s speech. I don’t really care why.
If you’re going to criticise someone for being unintelligible you really need to be intelligible yourself.
Politicians been at it for ages
Setting a target to build 1.5 million homes in this parliament and by changing planning so that the green belt can be built on (some always has ) by designating as Grey belt ( what ever that is) they will find that the nimbys & the eco/greens will tie up the courts and use direct action to try & stop these developments.
Literally no one wants to see that ever again:-)
Why would it not be social housing? The government does not build social houses, housebuilders do.House builders share prices have all gone up this morning, so I guess the majority won't be social housing