Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2009
- Messages
- 16,617
Most have time, they are just too lazy imo. Always come round to the same issue.Don’t have time to cook do use fast food?
Most have time, they are just too lazy imo. Always come round to the same issue.Don’t have time to cook do use fast food?
That’s just not true. Single parent working full time with 3 kids will not have enough time to cook fresh in time for kid’s tea time.Most have time, they are just too lazy imo. Always come round to the same issue.
How many single parents of three kids do you think work full time? Not many I bet.That’s just not true. Single parent working full time with 3 kids will not have enough time to cook fresh in time for kid’s tea time.
It’ll be oven chips and pizzas etc. They’re knackered and have 3 hangry kids.
More than you think.How many single parents of three kids do you think work full time? Not many I bet.
I think less than 10% what do you think?More than you think.
Far more.I think less than 10% what do you think?
Far more.
This notion that half the nation don’t work and are on UC is a nonsense.
Far more.
This notion that half the nation don’t work and are on UC is a nonsense.
More than 10%.Stay on the specific question.
What percentage of single parents with three children do you think work full time?
Exactly. To claim UC you need to apply for jobs unless there is a specific reason why they cannot.Corrected for you
This notion that half the nation does work and are on UC is correct.
Just had a Google and it came up with this.I think less than 10% what do you think?
Never mind.More than 10%.
Never mind.
I very much suspect that number drops dramatically if you have 3 kids as the system just doesn't make work pay if you have three kids unless you have a very well paid job.Just had a Google and it came up with this.
Nearly 7 in 10 (68.5%) lone parents were employed with over half of these employed full-time (51.8%) and under half employed part-time (48.2%).
Families and the labour market, UK - Office for National Statistics
The employment rates and employment practices of men and women with dependent children in the UK, based on data from the Labour Force Survey, Annual Population Survey and Time Use Survey.www.ons.gov.uk
No idea what you are on about I'm affraid?Cunningly clever defence when proven to be wrong.
You clearly watched the tory liars regularly and learned.
Never mind.I very much suspect that number drops dramatically if you have 3 kids as the system just doesn't make work pay if you have three kids unless you have a very well paid job.
The benefit cap for a single parent is £423 a week. To take that home as a single parent working full time and also factor in child care for say just two of the children and you would need to be taking home about £800- 850 a week. To take that home you would need to be earning about £65k a year.
What percentage of single parents of three kids do you think earn that much. 10% is probably an over estimate.
Never mind.
You’ve totally underestimated how many single parents actually work and are sticking to this niche point to move away from that.If you think I've worked out the costs wrongly please point out where. They are only ball park but probably not far off?
The single parent of three kids working full time was your analogy? I just put some numbers to it to see if it stacked up?
I very much suspect that number drops dramatically if you have 3 kids as the system just doesn't make work pay if you have three kids unless you have a very well paid job.
The benefit cap for a single parent is £423 a week. To take that home as a single parent working full time and also factor in child care for say just two of the children and you would need to be taking home about £800- 850 a week. To take that home you would need to be earning about £65k a year.
What percentage of single parents of three kids do you think earn that much. 10% is probably an over estimate.
Alan, sorry to labour the point but the three kids was your analogy! The single parent working full time with these kids was also your analogy. You used that argument to justify why people were too busy to cook! I said I thought that applied to very few ie 10% and have used some numbers and simple logic to justify that claim. Now if you think I'm wrong on your points, rather than moving the goal posts, please point out why I'm wrong?You’ve totally underestimated how many single parents actually work and are sticking to this niche point to move away from that.
It costs a fortune to raise 3 kids these days, so whatever figure you think is excessive will likely not be enough.
There aren’t as many Vicki Pollard’s as you think.