maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
Never said anyone did, there is a brexit thread on here though. Don't tell me you missed it
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Labour Government
- Thread starter SkyBlueFlux
- Start date
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
Think what you will, I was just pointing out the inaccuracies in your comments.Haha, rattled by a painting. Rattled by a paaaaaaaaainting. He’s really rattled by a painting.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,387
He lives and works there. He can do what he wants within reason. That includes rearranging pictures. :-)Think what you will, I was just pointing out the inaccuracies in your comments.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
If Brown had the right to put it there, surely Starmer has the right to take it away?
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
Rather than being intimidated by a portrait, would it not be better spending his time sorting out things like the 1.69 million immigrants that are currently costing us 8 billion a year. Or am I being picky again.He lives and works there. He can do what he wants within reason. That includes rearranging pictures. :-)
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,387
The 10 seconds he used to think and remove a picture is unlikely to have had much effect on timescales of other policies.Rather than being intimidated by a portrait, would it not be better spending his time sorting out things like the 1.69 million immigrants that are currently costing us 8 billion a year. Or am I being picky again.
It is petty though. He’d have been better drawing devil horns on her and having a smile each time he noticed the picture.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Not been in there for years , as poisonous as twitterNever said anyone did, there is a brexit thread on here though. Don't tell me you missed it
metalblue
Well-Known Member
If Brown had the right to put it there, surely Starmer has the right to take it away?
Brown put it there as a mark of respect. Starmer took it away because his autobiographer told him to.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
Brown put it there as a mark of respect. Starmer took it away because his autobiographer told him.
Didn't he show some self-respect in removing it?
Would having a portrait of a friend of pinochet and Savile inspire you at work?
maxwellblue
Well-Known Member
So you're advocating the prime minister defacing public property.The 10 seconds he used to think and remove a picture is unlikely to have had much effect on timescales of other policies.
It is petty though. He’d have been better drawing devil horns on her and having a smile each time he noticed the picture.