The Labour Government

[Chippy_boy]

Unless you know exactly the breakdown of that figure, you and I have no idea as to whether it was justifiable

3x what his successor spent over the same duration. Not +20%, -20%. 3x

QED

 

[mosssideblue]

3x what his successor spent over the same duration. Not +20%, -20%. 3x

QED

That does not prove money was being wasted

 

[west didsblue]

I was no fan of Johnson, mate. I thought he was a lying buffoon. But genuinely I don't recall any stories about him accepting bungs. Maybe I wasn't looking hard enough.

Check who paid for his wedding.

 

[stonerblue]

Is anyone surprised?
Socialist my arse. Just another self entitled posh boy. He is evil as is that **** of a woman Reeves.

Toxic, again..

 

[stonerblue]

childish nonsense

She's full of it.

 

[Blue and true]

I was no fan of Johnson, mate. I thought he was a lying buffoon. But genuinely I don't recall any stories about him accepting bungs. Maybe I wasn't looking hard enough.

I'd say you were walking around blindfolded.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

The amount of outrage in here is funny, given nothing Labour have done so far is as bad as the past 4 PMs have done.

Makes the evil rhetoric somewhat moot.

 

[Chippy_boy]

The amount of outrage in here is funny, given nothing Labour have done so far is as bad as the past 4 PMs have done.

Makes the evil rhetoric somewhat moot.

You've justed posted random nonsense here haven't you. No basis in fact whatsover, just anti-tory BS. Unless of course you have to hand the evidence about the previous 4 tory PM's dodgy expenses claims? No, I didn't think so.

 

[Chippy_boy]

The amount of outrage in here is funny, given nothing Labour have done so far is as bad as the past 4 PMs have done.

Makes the evil rhetoric somewhat moot.

And what makes Starmer's behaviour even more toxic is is rank hypocrisy. He's obvious just as bent as any of the tories who preceded him - seemingly more so - but is just a better liar.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

You've justed posted random nonsense here haven't you, admit it. No basis in fact whatsover, just anti-tory BS. Unless of course you have to hand the evidence about the previous 4 tory PM's dodgy expenses claims? No, I didn't think so.

I leave the posting of nonsense to you.

You didn’t post anything on here in between Brexit and Labour winning the election.

You’re now on 100 a day, posting any old shite you’ve spotted.

I’m just happy Starmer is getting all the attention now and the asylum seekers are left in peace to have their claims heard.

 

[metalblue]

Pathetic.

All I can think about is Dolly Partons Jolene song now…

Chippy, chippy, chipy-eeeeeeeee
I’m begging of you please don’t slag off my maaaaaan
Chippy, chippy, chipy-eeeeeeeee
Please don’t criticise him just because you can

 

[Chippy_boy]

You didn’t post anything on here in between Brexit and Labour winning the election.

Er, because they weren't in power?? And therefore a complete irrelevance.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Er, because they weren't in power?? And therefore a complete irrelevance.

There were 4 PMs that were in power that were relevant, corrupt and immoral though.

 

[Chippy_boy]

There were 4 PMs that were in power that were relevant, corrupt and immoral though.

You're doing it again. Randon nonsense.

My turn. Some giraffes have 6 legs. There we go, it's easy this making stuff up lark.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

You're doing it again. Randon nonsense.

My turn. Some giraffes have 6 legs. There we go, it's easy this making stuff up lark.

You were silent in the Political subforum here for the years your party was corrupt, immoral and inciting rhetoric to the brink of riots.

Now you’re posting 100 posts a day about Starmer as you can’t stand the fact you’re no longer in power.

It’s not a difficult concept to understand.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

You were silent in the Political subforum here for the years your party was corrupt, immoral and inciting rhetoric to the brink of riots.

Now you’re posting 100 posts a day about Starmer as you can’t stand the fact you’re no longer in power.

It’s not a difficult concept to understand.

Love it that you think @Chippy_boy used to be 'in power'.

 

[Chippy_boy]

You were silent in the Political subforum here for the years your party was corrupt, immoral and inciting rhetoric to the brink of riots.

Now you’re posting 100 posts a day about Starmer as you can’t stand the fact you’re no longer in power.

It’s not a difficult concept to understand.

Absolute tosh pal. Putting aside the claim about 100 posts per day, which is more made up bollocks, I have always been a believer in conservative principles, so not so much need for me to post on a thread criticising Tories, and as I say, no need to be on the Labour thread as they were an irrelevance. Now, sadly, they are not an irrelvance.

There's also the small matter that I am winding down at work now as I am retiring shortly, so not so busy.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Absolute tosh pal. Putting aside the claim about 100 posts per day, which is more made up bollocks, I have always been a believer in conservative principles, so not so much need for me to post on a thread criticising Tories, and as I say, no need to be on the Labour thread as they were an irrelevance. Now, sadly, they are not an irrelvance.

There's also the small matter that I am winding down at work now as I am retiring shortly, so not so busy.

But you’re not attacking Labour’s principles, you’re going after expenses.

Anyway, knock yourself out. It’s fun watching the hypocrisy in action.

 

[Chippy_boy]

But you’re not attacking Labour’s principles, you’re going after expenses.

Anyway, knock yourself out. It’s fun watching the hypocrisy in action.

Is it fun watching Stamer's hypocrisy? Or is it only fun when it's not one of your own?

And BTW, the first time I heard about Starmer's expenses was this morning, in my news feed. So funnily enough I was appalled by it and highlighted it here. No shame in that.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Is it fun watching Stamer's hypocrisy? Or is it only fun when it's not one of your own?

Seems to be for you. I’ve already said I wouldn’t have stopped the WFA until energy prices meant we didn’t have to subsidise peoples’ heating.

I’m happy that the asylum crisis is being resolved having been created deliberately by the previous government.

I’m happy that the rhetoric is cooling down.

The country isn’t going to be rectified in a few years, but the trend can begin.

There was no Hope under the previous government. We were in a race to the bottom.

Now we’re going to have to stop that momentum and start rebuilding.

We don’t know how long Labour will be in for. That’ll depend what the Tories can salvage from the bin fire that is left at the moment.