west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 33,875
Who’s put him in a box?So did I but it comforts them to put you into a box.
Who’s put him in a box?So did I but it comforts them to put you into a box.
Just for context.
Labour are doing very well and Starmer is a proper PM. Carry on.
Enough of Farage. What about Starmer? ;)What a wonderful man he is. Ra ra ra.
Sorry to burst your bubble but he's a vile, revolting, lying, odious, incompetent twat. Universally hated barring you and 2 mates.
Reminds me of a place I visited back in 2010. Not sure of the name but I think it began with an A and ended with a zThese campsites where they concentrate people even have security and fences these days is an incredible line tbf.
Maybe he just worked there ... a jobs a jobs and all that;-)
Who did you choose? Liz Truss?Not surprised you went for Southgate - first love and all that.
I am not so sure. Japan's debt is indeed in a different league but the nature of the debt lends it greater stability, i.e only around 10% of it is held by foreign investors, the rest by BOJ and other Japanese institutions so capital flight less likely. It is also underpinned by a far higher domestic savings rate than our own, in any event, as you can see, the market is happy to run with them albeit there have been some rumblings of late.We are miles off bankruptcy as a country. Check out our nat debt compared to France ? We have a long way to go to get near theirs and they have a long way to go before they go bust. Then check out Japan's nat debt. Its staggering.
Many here would wish what you suggest. Polls say otherwise.Enough of Farage. What about Starmer? ;)
Are you Lord Alli by any chance?Is he ?
Comes across alright to me.
Not a lying grifting racist like the bloke you will vote for - in fact the opposite, a man that’s been fighting for human rights and worked in criminal defence shaping the justice system for better - and that’s even before the achievements he has done as PM. A proper statesmen and PM at long last. No wonder those on far right resent him.
That you think so, gives me confidence I'm on the right lines ;-)Ben Habib??
You’re fucking hilarious these days.
I didn’t often agree with you in years gone by but you could usually put across a reasonable argument to support your position.
These days you seem to have lost your ability to make an informed judgment and just go along with far right slogans that are designed to appeal to morons.
Well if YOU say so, we're all convinced.Just for the hard of understanding - the haters are beyond me I know but Under the Tory Rwanda scheme, migrants had a 1:100 chance of being deported.Under the pilot 1-in-1-out scheme, migrants have a 1:17 chance of being deported. And that a pilot - who's to say it wouldn't be improved going forwards?
Really ?Finally a serious PM that can have the relationship with our neighbours to deal with the migrant crises - Macron wouldn’t give two fucks about Farage.
Well done Starmer.
Just for those unable to see beyond the obvious..Just for the hard of understanding - the haters are beyond me I know but Under the Tory Rwanda scheme, migrants had a 1:100 chance of being deported.Under the pilot 1-in-1-out scheme, migrants have a 1:17 chance of being deported. And that a pilot - who's to say it wouldn't be improved going forwards?
Just for those unable to see beyond the obvious..
The unlucky 50 per week max are being taken back to France. Let me think, what will they do ? trudge the thousands of miles back home? or turn around and head back to Calais for another go ? What would stop them ? Ah you may say, they will not have the money for another crossing, indeed but if I was an enterprising people smuggler keen to keep my numbers up, I would be offering a free 2nd crossing if you were unlucky enough to be sent back.
Whereas Rwanda is in central Africa - chances are you are not coming back.
Well if YOU say so, we're all convinced.
Have a good evening!
Nooo BobThe Reform plan is fairly straightforward. It’s isolationism. Creating a closed economy that requires minimal outside links. It’s not dissimilar to old style Labour thinking with British jobs for British people and a planned economy. This is the current Republican/Trump model. Tariffs to reduce imports and control of the economy in the hands of few via the State. It is easier to control a people if they are isolated from the outside and kept in check by imposing qualifying criteria to access health care, education etc. Whether this works in the US is arguable, but isolationism does seem to be the driving force behind current policy and has a long history in the US
You also create a division within the country. The more prosperous Cities are crime ridden hellholes especially if run by ‘liberals’. In the UK, London is the target. It’s wealthy, diverse and run by an ‘outsider’ who is Muslim. London thus becomes Khan’s immigrant ghetto with Muslim law and crime infested neighbourhoods.
Farage and Reform just need a target and something to ‘leave’ which will make everything ‘all right’ again. EU, ECHR, NATO, UN. There will always be some outside organisation that is responsible for all our ills. Green policies will be another battleground. It involves change, different ways of thinking and utilisation of resources and Reform voters hate and are suspicious of change. And science and medicine.
There is, and I’ve touched upon this before, an intellectual incoherence on the Right of politics. They will vote for Johnson (fuck business) and champion business. Johnson wanted a high wage economy and a levelling up of the UK via the State. Truss wanted a lean economy with minimal State involvement and protections. And those on the Right will look at these two philosophies and nod along in agreement to both without blinking. Which is why arguing with these people is pointless. They are ‘follow the leader’ types. They think what their leader thinks, no matter how contradictory.
Don't listen to @Alan Harper's Tash, don't go there.Which is why arguing with these people is pointless.
As I said. You need the confrontation. Without it, you’re the pissed loons in Wetherspoons.Nooo Bob
Don't listen to @Alan Harper's Tash, don't go there.
Soon there won't be any Centrist Dad's left, we need you and your nonsense.
Just for those unable to see beyond the obvious..
The unlucky 50 per week max are being taken back to France. Let me think, what will they do ? trudge the thousands of miles back home? or turn around and head back to Calais for another go ? What would stop them ? Ah you may say, they will not have the money for another crossing, indeed but if I was an enterprising people smuggler keen to keep my numbers up, I would be offering a free 2nd crossing if you were unlucky enough to be sent back.
Whereas Rwanda is in central Africa - chances are you are not coming back.
Rwanda was all about deterrence, there were lots of early indications it would serve that purpose very well.Biometric data is taken for everyone who gets deported, so if they try again, they are automatically deported again.
50 a week is also the pilot scheme. Rwanda was initially set up for a few hundred initially, and the Rwandans said they would not take more than a few thousand maximum.
Lol , I can see your not much of a buisnessmanThe Rwanda scheme cost £700 MILLION to send 4 volunteers there - do the maths per person - 50 per week = 2600 a year at no cost and thats a pilot that can be increased.
A free 2nd crossing? Oh do fuck off they are not a charity the idea they will offer a second free crossing is for the birds as for Rwanda once you got there you were free to go wherever you wanted to go ..... maybe even back to the channel