The Labour Party

The inland revenue normally carry out investigations Angela Rayner has a dozen cops, what was going on in her council house, was it the seat of a major tax avoidance crime ? The Tories demand a review and the police jump to investigate
After Covid the police weren’t interested in party-gate they relented and reluctantly agreed to look into the carry on double standards
 
Kirkstall Blue said:
The inland revenue normally carry out investigations Angela Rayner has a dozen cops, what was going on in her council house, was it the seat of a major tax avoidance crime ? The Tories demand a review and the police jump to investigate
After Covid the police weren’t interested in party-gate they relented and reluctantly agreed to look into the carry on double standards
Click to expand...

She definitely smokes in the commons bogs I've been told:-)
 
hilts said:
She definitely smokes in the commons bogs I've been told:-)
Click to expand...

Sounds like Drone's dream job ...

MV5BOGI1MjIxNjUtNGNjNC00NDU3LWJhNmUtOWI3OTcwYTQwMmU4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyOTc5MDI5NjE@._V1_.jpg
 
Kirkstall Blue said:


A dozen cops now investigating Angela Rayner over her council house sale in 2010 meanwhile.
Click to expand...

To be fair, I can understand why they need a dozen officers.

I live in a close with about 15 houses. I know everyone by name, and see most of them regularly, but haven't got a clue if they're really there. I found out recently that one neighbour had been spending most of the week looking after his mum in Blackburn for the last two years. Still saw him most weeks, and assumed he lived there full time. Another couple I was told had split up, but see them both regularly and couldn't tell you who had moved out. I don't think I've ever lived somewhere where I could guarantee a neighbour was in their house more than a few nights a week.

I assume satellite images, gps tracking, cctv and phone date could all be commandeered. It's probably been long deleted, but if we put another ten officers on the case, we could probably crack this sometime after the next election.
 
They need to have it under one umbrella, I’m not an expert at all but it just seems ludicrous that they have different companies for different aspects. It certainly can’t be any worse, watching that Ben Elton documentary was an eye opener.
 
Blue Maverick said:
They need to have it under one umbrella, I’m not an expert at all but it just seems ludicrous that they have different companies for different aspects. It certainly can’t be any worse, watching that Ben Elton documentary was an eye opener.
Click to expand...
That's the intention. Track and trains. But taking track maintenance under direct control would probably still be done by contracting with private firms - though as with train procurement that system is prone to fluctuations in demand that may leave some companies with no work at times.

I don't think we'll depart too much from EU rules on opening the system to competition (perhaps one reason why they'll still allow "open access" to companies like Hull Trains and Lumo on the East Coast main line).
 
TinFoilHat said:
news.sky.com

Labour denies railways will be given 'lower priority' under renationalisation plans - as Tories warn of 'wildcat strikes'

The shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh says her party will establish Great British Railways to "get Britain moving", but Transport Secretary Mark Harper accuses Labour of having no plan to pay for it.
news.sky.com news.sky.com

I'll believe it when I see it. Must be a GE due.
Click to expand...
Well, at least we can now hold them to account if it doesn’t happen. A promise is a promise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top