The Labour Party

[Gareth Barry Conlon]

Starmer has paid off anti semitism accusers, Jackson paid off a paedo accuser.
That there are more involved in the first case, doesn't negate the analogy, but
hey-ho, it's up to you.

This is miles off.

He has accepted the allegations of the whistle-blowers and apologised for their treatment. What else would you want him to do?

 

[BobKowalski]

Sure, that sounds like a Michael Jackson solution, bung them $25 million and that'll
make it all go away, nobody will ever think he was a paedo.

No. It’s also about Starmer refusing to accept anti-semitism within the Party, sending out a clear message on the issue and accepting the errors of the past.

Look forward to a Tory Party stuffed full of racist, anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim members with a ruling clique rooted in English nationalism and Brexit doing the same.

Spoiler: It won’t.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

This is miles off.

He has accepted the allegations of the whistle-blowers and apologised for their treatment. What else would you want him to do?

I'm not bothered what he does, I was just countering the suggestion
that by paying off anti semitism supporters, that somehow makes the Labour party
whiter than white, and that ends the matter. It just confirms the accusers were correct.

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

Starmer has paid off anti semitism accusers, Jackson paid off a paedo accuser.
That there are more involved in the first case, doesn't negate the analogy, but
hey-ho, it's up to you.

Starmer has settled on behalf of the Labour party, an entity. The analogy doesn't stack up and associating Starmer in the same context as a suspected paedo is poor form.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

No. It’s also about Starmer refusing to accept anti-semitism within the Party, sending out a clear message on the issue and accepting the errors of the past.

And it also confirms the party was riddled with anti semitism, many discounted it.

 

[Gareth Barry Conlon]

I'm not bothered what he does, I was just countering the suggestion
that by paying off anti semitism supporters, that somehow makes the Labour party
whiter than white, and that ends the matter. It just confirms the accusers were correct.

I don't think you know what your talking about.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Starmer has settled on behalf of the Labour party, an entity. The analogy doesn't stack up and associating Starmer in the same context as a suspected paedo is poor form.

I'm associating the party, which he has the job of leading, I'm not accusing
him directly of anything, his party, led by Corbyn, knowingly harboured anti semites,
go back months on here and there were plenty who were saying they didn't.
Paying people off won't change the past, they now carry that stain.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

I don't think you know what your talking about.

Are the accusers not correct?

 

[ganganvince]

Are the accusers not correct?

They must be or there is a possibility of a misuse of party funds case.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

They must be or there is a possibility of a misuse of party funds case.

Indeed.