Something wrong with that video Rachel can’t hear the question, it’s fake the rest of the video is cut trying to make her look daft
Here we go the rest of the video
Really! People posting disinformation on BM?
Be careful what you wish for.... Be very careful, 25 years of uninterrupted Labour rule and Wales is broken mess, education poor, longest NHS waiting lists, industry falling apart, corrupt first minister who has accepted corrupt donations, sacked a minister without an inquiry/investigation and deleted evidence around the COVID inquiry... Like I say, be careful what you wish for as according to KS Wales is the blueprint for the UKs future. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/7sAsr54T4ndrV1SU/
Couldn't agree more with tactically asbelieve me living in Wales under Labour rule is miles worse.Couldn’t have summarised the last ten years of Tory corruption and mismanagement any better than this. Time for change. Vote Labour (or tactically).
Couldn't agree more with tactically asbelieve me living in Wales under Labour rule is miles worse.
Re-open which legal routes? By international law there are no legal routes because the UK does not need to recognise an asylum claim whilst an asylum seeker is in France. Our obligations begin when somebody enters the UK, why should the taxpayer pay to go beyond this?Labour’s plan is the only plan that will work. Re-open legal routes for asylum seekers and process them in a timely manner. That completely eradicated the need to make the dangerous crossing and those who, and not within the legislation, are then extradited back to their own country.
It’s a simple plan, but the only one.
Re-open which legal routes? By international law there are no legal routes because the UK does not need to recognise an asylum claim whilst an asylum seeker is in France. Our obligations begin when somebody enters the UK, why should the taxpayer pay to go beyond this?
Not a single country in the world does this differently either. Countries in Europe don't have border posts in African countries to stop the Mediterranean crossings.
Asylum seekers currently have the right to apply for asylum in the country that they're currently in. It just so happens however that there is water between us and France but there is also water between the USA and France. Should the USA also have a border post in France just in case asylum seekers fancy living in the USA too?
Nobody is crossing the Channel alone, they're doing it because they're being trafficked by criminal gangs. Disrupt the gangs and make it difficult and you reduce the flow of people. Labour has the right idea to attack this problem which is to treat it for what it is, a criminal act which can be stopped.