Oh. So when you said it was 53 pages of f... all, you were just presuming, as you've not actually read any of it.
I see we have scaled the heights. The past seems another planet to some on here. In my younger atheist days I listened to Bertrand Russell talk about a conversation with his grandmother who recalled being told a story about the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes by a relative alive at the time it happened. A direct chain of oral transmission back to 1685. Less than half a dozen similar exchanges would have you back to first century Palestine.Would rather stick my balls on a electric fence that read about made up shit.
Odd by even your standards.Ultimate tedium, the Atheist's Reward - as one bag of chemicals said to another.
And I read a story on here from a first hand account of a shit bag being slapped on a train and another taking 'a fence' after a game.I see we have scaled the heights. The past seems another planet to some on here. In my younger atheist days I listened to Bertrand Russell talk about a conversation with his grandmother who recalled being told a story about the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes by a relative alive at the time it happened. A direct chain of oral transmission back to 1685. Less than half a dozen similar exchanges would have you back to first century Palestine.
I see we have scaled the heights. The past seems another planet to some on here. In my younger atheist days I listened to Bertrand Russell talk about a conversation with his grandmother who recalled being told a story about the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes by a relative alive at the time it happened. A direct chain of oral transmission back to 1685. Less than half a dozen similar exchanges would have you back to first century Palestine.
I thought an oddity like you would appreciate it.Odd by even your standards.
Back to religion = terrorism with excremental decoration. Reasoned atheist debate.And I read a story on here from a first hand account of a shit bag being slapped on a train and another taking 'a fence' after a game.
Not sure I'd alter my world view and blow others up for either to be honest, but whatever floats your boat.
Magnificent logic, you must have felt quite at home chatting to your mother-in-law in her declining years. I'm sure you held your own with the local cats too.My mother in law died last year aged 98. In her last years she was doolally. She believed the ad on TV with a cat serenading a budgie was real, and that cats could talk.
Now imagine a direct chain of oral transmission back to 1685 with people like that.
They might even end up believing the nonsense you do.
Hope, simply acknowledging Chinese whispers over 1700 years are likely to be rather suspect.Back to religion = terrorism with excremental decoration. Reasoned atheist debate.
An incoherent first sentence followed by the Pavlovian atheist smear.Hope, simply acknowledging Chinese whispers over 1700 years are likely to be rather suspect.
Religion does seem to breed terrorism doesn't it though, now that you mention it.