The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 25,949
Saying they have "legitimate concerns" didn't work either, did it?
I fully understand where you're coming from, but I think we need to stop pretending it's OK to march in support of violent racists. All it has achieved is legitimising racism in a way it hasn't been for probably 40 - 50 years.
A clear and consistent line from all leaders in society that racism is not acceptable has made a huge change in the country of that time. We're losing it overnight unless we wake up.
Not all protest marches are the same, some are organised around a single identifiable cause and then various allies of that cause march together, the support for Palestine marches are like that, you get trade unions, religious group, even Gays for Palestine, all allies united around an easily identifiable issue.
The Anti-Nazi League and Rock Against Racism was not the same, the cause was easily identifiable but it was a front for the SWP, everyone knew it but we didn't care, those that did care, and there were groups that did, gave it a swerve, but for those who threw their lot in we were simply using the SWP's organisational skill to get the central message out and the Trotskyist stuff was immaterial. For the SWP they saw the mood swing against the NF in the late 70s and created a vehicle to harness it and in turn piggybacked on that movement.
Unite the Kingdom is a hybrid of the two. Robinson and his crew are doing what the SWP did, they've seen the mood swing in this country and created a vehicle to harness it and in turn piggybacked on that movement. But, and this is the crucial difference, back in the day we all knew what the Anti-Nazi League and Rock Against Racism was and what we wanted to achieve, there was a unanimity of purpose, we wanted the fascists off our streets and in the bin and in that we succeeded, of course while we were doing this Thatcher got in, but that's a debate for another day. But Unite the Kingdom doesn't have that unanimity of purpose, you might think it does because you want to label everyone on the march as the same, but it's as obvious as the nose on your face that while Robinson has managed to harness a mood he hasn't monopolised the message, and that opens up opportunities for killing it.
And the first thing you do to finish Robinson and his crew is to find out if there are reasonable folk on that march that you can deal with reasonably, with the emphasis on reason. Are they marching coz they do have legitimate concerns and the only one who has stepped up to address them is Robinson with his lies? If so then he needs to have the rug pulled from under him by wrestling the narrative away and addressing those folk directly, that way you can reveal some, perhaps most of those concerns as baseless and then address whatever legitimate concerns they have directly. Some folk in here think their concerns are a consequence of manufactured scarcity, groups scrapping over resources that create pointless conflict, some might believe it's existential, a sense of loss of national identity, or the failure of multiculturalism, frankly I don't give a fuck what it is right now, coz right now we're not talking we're shouting.
What I do know right now is labelling that pot pouri of people on that march as Tommy Robinson clones does absolutely nothing other than make the nice folk in here feel better about themselves, and that will not achieve a single fucking thing.
Last edited: