richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 34,109
Transitions have also been less of a problem since Nunes and Khusanov became the right side of defence.
When we think of times when transitions were a nightmare for us, we had so may injuries and were lucky if we had Nathan/Ruben behind Bernie, and none had the pace to deal with it without an additional physical central midfielder.
Properly linked or just wish lists and twitter guesses ?
I agree about the end of the season, to an extent, but our fixtures were very thick and very fast, and compounded by Rodri's injury/return from.I thought we looked incredibly vulnerable to them at the tail end of this season, and away games throughout. Everton and Bournemouth caused us loads of issues as recent examples.
Pep’s use of NOR has got the best from him, but was quite different to the way our fullbacks have inverted in the past. Bernardo I guess was intended to sit in with Rodri as a result, but in typical fashion he was usually everywhere. It’s what left us looking incredibly easy to attack through the centre in a lot of games this season for me.
Looks okay, though a couple of those homegrown would need to go into the free list,there's only 2 club trained ,would need to lose 1.Donnarumma
Nunes Guehi Gvardiol O'Reilly
Rodri [Anderson]
Semenyo Cherki Doku
Haaland
[Charles] (Bettinelli)
[Porro] Dias Khusanov Ait-Nouri (Ake)
Gonzalez Kovacic
Foden Reijnders [New LW?]
Marmoush
Things starting to take shape already. 8 homegrown players in bold.
Would Pierce Charles not count as club trained? Or does he need to have been over a certain age while he was with City to be considered as such?Looks okay, though a couple of those homegrown would need to go into the free list,there's only 2 club trained ,would need to lose 1.
Not sure but from wat I can tell he left fror Sheffield Wednesday when he was 17 thought it was 3 years he'd have needed to be at City before he was 21 to qualify, could be wrong.Would Pierce Charles not count as club trained? Or does he need to have been over a certain age while he was with City to be considered as such?
Yeah like Olise, was here but not for long enough.Not sure but from wat I can tell he left fror Sheffield Wednesday when he was 17 thought it was 3 years he'd have needed to be at City before he was 21 to qualify, could be wrong.
Porro too.Yeah like Olise, was here but not for long enough.
I don’t want to sell Savinho. There’s hardly anyone out there of the same profile that isn’t a project. Savio wants out though so I’d probably suggest keeping Marmoush and keeping Semenyo at RW. He, Mcaidoo and Foden can rotate.I suggested Wilson both as a player and as an example of the type of player that we could utilise. If Savinho leaves, as is reported, who is it you recommend we move for? What attributes would they bring and how much would you suggest we spend?
I don’t want to sell Savinho. There’s hardly anyone out there of the same profile that isn’t a project. Savio wants out though so I’d probably suggest keeping Marmoush and keeping Semenyo at RW. He, Mcaidoo and Foden can rotate.
Fair enough. As I’ve acknowledged, I’m quite sanguine when it comes to Marmoush and Savinho staying, but if the latter leaves, we’ll probably need a replacement to rotate properly. I’d considered Foden, but I fear what it would do to his confidence if he ended up back on the wing, and McAidoo only has 158 minutes ‘experience’ against a League 1 and a League 2 side, respectively. No matter how fast he is, he’d be kicked from pillar to post.I don’t want to sell Savinho. There’s hardly anyone out there of the same profile that isn’t a project. Savio wants out though so I’d probably suggest keeping Marmoush and keeping Semenyo at RW. He, Mcaidoo and Foden can rotate.
That is a STRONG group.Anderson
Maza
Palestra
Barcola
That is a STRONG group.
What you've heard, or what you hope?