The "Stamp"....

[theboyfrombrazil]

Re: Graham Poll Cranks Up The Pressure on Plattenberg

Fcuking bring it on. I'm expecting it will feature quite heavily on question night as well.
Prime Ministers question time should make good listening, I dare say some sad arsehole will bring it up there as well.

We know what this is about and it's got fcuk all to do with Adebayor. - The FA are sh*tting red bricks that City could upset their cosy arrangement with Chelsea Arsenal Liverpool and the scum. How dare we win 4 games on the bounce !!

"Let's ban this Adebayor chappy for seventeen games."

"oh and recind Scholes' Red while were about it"

The FA are a fcuking joke, and no mark cnuts like Graham Poll should keep it shut.

 

[deano ou812]

Re: You do know he will get about 8 game ban.....

I've been reading the FA disciplinary guidelines and can't see how it would be possible to take any further action in the case of the goal celebration

When is The FA prevented from taking action?
FIFA guidelines aimed at avoiding the “re-refereeing” of matches generally
prevent The FA from taking disciplinary action on incidents which are seen and
dealt with at the time by the match officials (this includes taking no action). As a
general rule, if the match officials see an incident and have jurisdiction to take
action, The FA cannot act retrospectively.
For instance, these guidelines prevent The FA from upgrading/downgrading
yellow and red cards based on retrospective advice provided by the match
referee.

This is pretty clear.

Also in the case of the stamp (and it was a stamp) then he would only receive the same sanction as he would have had the referee seen the incident, and there are set penalties offered.

Incidents not seen by the match officials but caught on video
How it works
Applies to the more serious sending-off offences (violent conduct, serious foul
play, spitting, offensive/insulting/abusive language or behaviour) where the
match officials did not see the incident. The purpose is to put the player in the
same position as if the incident had been seen by the match officials.
The Compliance Department is guided by the referee’s view of whether the
incident merited a dismissal.
The processes mirror the timings and sanctions that would apply had any of the
match officials seen the incident and the referee then sent the player off.
A charge must be issued within two working days of the incident, with a response
due from the club within one day of receipt of the charge.
When a charge is issued, a set penalty is offered (eg. three matches for violent
conduct).

Finally, he can't appeal against the decision, only against the sanction and can only appeal sanctions which are longer than a 3 match ban.

Appeals
When are they allowed?
For incidents not seen by the match officials, appeals are against sanction only,
not the decision of guilt. In addition, appeals are only permitted for suspensions
over 3 matches, and only against the part of the suspension over 3 matches (eg
the fourth match of a four-match ban). There is no right to personal
representation for either the participant or The FA – the appeal is on submitted
evidence only.

With all of that, I reckon Ade's looking at a three match ban for the stamp. It would show that they had taken decisive action over an incident which rightly or wrongly is very much in the public eye, and city would be unable to appeal.

That said, they a still a bunch of useless twatters

graham (three card) poll was on sky and said the fa had changed some rules at the end of last season concerning players being booked when a red is merited after reviews...

 

[Thaksins Love Child]

Re: news at 10 tonight

He hasn't been charged yet, so what hearing? Must have been old footage.

 

[Mike D]

Re: Graham Poll Cranks Up The Pressure on Plattenberg

Not the first time that Poll has put his 2 penth where its not wanted. The best thing about the cheating scum is no longer involved in the game.

 

[Benarbia's Fat Dad]

Re: You do know he will get about 8 game ban.....

graham (three card) poll was on sky and said the fa had changed some rules at the end of last season concerning players being booked when a red is merited after reviews...

Absolute fucker - Graham Poll that is, not you.

If they have changed the rules then they haven't updated their own guidance documents.
I guess we'll find out tomorrow.

 

[Ducado]

Adebayor (Merged)

Far too many topics on the same subject, so I am going to merge a few, we really don't need another thread for every point of view

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Re: news at 10 tonight

He hasn't been charged yet, so what hearing? Must have been old footage.

Already banged up at the Scrubs. They're letting him out in time for the FA Cup Third Round tie - we've got Arsenal at home!

 

[Blue Smarties]

Re: Adebayor (Merged)

Hypocrite ;).

 

[Blue Si O.B]

Re: Adebayor (Merged)

ssn is saying that even if we appeal the ban will still be in place by friday

 

[deano ou812]

Re: You do know he will get about 8 game ban.....

graham (three card) poll was on sky and said the fa had changed some rules at the end of last season concerning players being booked when a red is merited after reviews...

Absolute fucker - Graham Poll that is, not you.

If they have changed the rules then they haven't updated their own guidance documents.
I guess we'll find out tomorrow.

the hearing tomorrow can not be a fair one after all the one sided press reports the fa will have to be seen to be hard on ade or again the press will be up in arms...