manimanc
Well-Known Member
Sounds like something off pills n thrills n bellyaches. Baggy was a quarter of a century ago...lets push things forward with the new roses sound.This is akin to saying Altrincham are better than Barcelona.
Sounds like something off pills n thrills n bellyaches. Baggy was a quarter of a century ago...lets push things forward with the new roses sound.This is akin to saying Altrincham are better than Barcelona.
Genuinely perplexed by the Stone Roses love in on here, there seems to be more Pellegrini fans than non Roses fans on here. They do seem along with the likes of Nirvana and New Order to be sacred cows with the music press.
The first album isn't bad but is completely retro, part The Byrds, Buffalo Springfield with bits of Love and Sly and the Family Stone. The second album is like the worst excesses of 'cock rock' in parts and don't get me started on that new single..devoid of originality and cliche ridden, safe, bland Dad-Rock and as far removed from anything remotely left field. I'd class the Stone Roses as a more down and dirty Coldplay, file alongside Stereophonics and Kasabian.
Squire is a fine guitar player and Reni is a superb drummer but Ian Brown...if Pete Best is the unluckiest person in popular music then Ian Brown has to be the luckiest, seldom has anyone so devoid of talent been so lauded, a voice which if you described as being mediocre would be doing him a favour.
As I said can't figure out the attraction, they do seem to attract an audience who's loyalty to them is like football support, don't know if in many cases it is a case of wanting to fit in and belong coupled with more than a touch of nostalgia. I'm as it appears in here very much in the minority but I genuinely cannot see the attraction.
It's all about the magic of the four of them.....if you don't feel it then you're wasting your time.Genuinely perplexed by the Stone Roses love in on here, there seems to be more Pellegrini fans than non Roses fans on here. They do seem along with the likes of Nirvana and New Order to be sacred cows with the music press.
The first album isn't bad but is completely retro, part The Byrds, Buffalo Springfield with bits of Love and Sly and the Family Stone. The second album is like the worst excesses of 'cock rock' in parts and don't get me started on that new single..devoid of originality and cliche ridden, safe, bland Dad-Rock and as far removed from anything remotely left field. I'd class the Stone Roses as a more down and dirty Coldplay, file alongside Stereophonics and Kasabian.
Squire is a fine guitar player and Reni is a superb drummer but Ian Brown...if Pete Best is the unluckiest person in popular music then Ian Brown has to be the luckiest, seldom has anyone so devoid of talent been so lauded, a voice which if you described as being mediocre would be doing him a favour.
As I said can't figure out the attraction, they do seem to attract an audience who's loyalty to them is like football support, don't know if in many cases it is a case of wanting to fit in and belong coupled with more than a touch of nostalgia. I'm as it appears in here very much in the minority but I genuinely cannot see the attraction.
Ian Browns voice is the topic of many discussions and everyone knows he is not the greatest vocalist going. To call devoid of talent is ludicrous, he is a fantastic song writer and has wrote some absolutely stunning songs. He also taught himself how to play numerous instruments after the demise of The Roses.
You want the luckiest person in music then that title belongs to Mr Andy ' Fletch' Fletcher. He is probably far richer than all The Stone Roses yet can't really play any instruments nor has he ever written any songs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Fletcher_(musician)
Ian Browns voice is the topic of many discussions and everyone knows he is not the greatest vocalist going. To call devoid of talent is ludicrous, he is a fantastic song writer and has wrote some absolutely stunning songs. He also taught himself how to play numerous instruments after the demise of The Roses.
You want the luckiest person in music then that title belongs to Mr Andy ' Fletch' Fletcher. He is probably far richer than all The Stone Roses yet can't really play any instruments nor has he ever written any songs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Fletcher_(musician)
It's all about the magic of the four of them.....if you don't feel it then you're wasting your time.
A few heads are saying the lyrics are bobbins, they're actually really clever when you listen properly.
True to form and just like every song they have ever done total shite
One of the most overated groups of all time
Popular just because it became trendy to say you liked them just like the Artic Monkeys in that respect
Ian Browns voice is the topic of many discussions and everyone knows he is not the greatest vocalist going. To call devoid of talent is ludicrous, he is a fantastic song writer and has wrote some absolutely stunning songs. He also taught himself how to play numerous instruments after the demise of The Roses.
You want the luckiest person in music then that title belongs to Mr Andy ' Fletch' Fletcher. He is probably far richer than all The Stone Roses yet can't really play any instruments nor has he ever written any songs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Fletcher_(musician)
There you go :)I could do with one of these to liven up the front room, where could i buy such a painting?
Little story behind this photo. Kevin cummins shot it and being a big city fan he said he wanted blue and white paint whereas mani, Ian Brown and John squire wanted red and white being dirty rags.There you go :)![]()
Guess that will be me in June :)Heard the new single this morning. Bang average but the pissheads who don't mind paying £100 to sway about at the back of some enormadome will lap it up.
Nice storyLittle story behind this photo. Kevin cummins shot it and being a big city fan he said he wanted blue and white paint whereas mani, Ian Brown and John squire wanted red and white being dirty rags.