The Stones Goal

Was it right to give a goal?


  • Total voters
    866
Just the usual, a goal is given correctly for us and its all over the place in the media, there are discussions, headline news, comments open for bile by others etc etc
Arsenals goal v us was far far worse, an actual foul on Ederson and its what they do at every set piece yet absolutely fuck all by the media on it
 
God this is hard work

1 I said the goal should stand

2 Silva backed in as the corner was being taken, if a keeper is for example thrown to the ground while a corner is about to be taken or after its taken 2 things happen, a retake or a foul is given so it is possible fo be penalised before a ball is kicked.

You can’t concede a foul while the ball isn’t in play.
 
Of course it’s a goal. They (pundits) are only disagreeing to create a drama and keep themselves relevant . If the refs and VAR did their jobs properly they would hardly have anything to talk about cause most of them lack any knowledge about the game beyond the basics. If not at the game I never ever watch on sky, they are all full of shit. Including micah.
Johnny johnny stooooooonnnneeeesssss!!
Cmon city
 
He's obviously not impacting the keeper in the offside position, and if you're giving a foul for him slightly backing into the keeper then no one is ever scoring from a corner ever again.
 
He wasn't offside when the contact was made it was a corner and when stones headed it he was on the floor.
Should of been a pen for the push on Bernardoooooo
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.