The Super League | FA + PL: New Charter & Fines | UEFA: Settlement

Would you be happy if City joined this European Super League?

  • Yes

    Votes: 109 5.3%
  • No

    Votes: 1,954 94.7%

  • Total voters
    2,063
What I don’t understand is that these owners are very rich people and must have made some very astute decision making in their time.
It was my belief that business does considerable market research before developing a new product.
This has clearly not happened here and hopefully a big wake up call that ultimately a collective fan base is where the real power lies.
All competitions must be on merit.
 
Also to those looking at Bayern and PSG.

Having thought about it, assuming they were offered, they would have considered it, don't be naive enough to think they wouldn't. However there are some big factors which separate those clubs from Chelsea and City:

Bayern - Here is the 50+1 rule of the Bundesliga - In order to obtain a license to compete in the Bundesliga, a club must hold a majority of its own voting rights. The rule is designed to ensure that the club's members retain overall control, by way of owning 50% of shares, +1 share, protecting clubs from the influence of external investors.

PSG - They finally have influence with UEFA, they have a seat on the executive board and via beIN their owners have invested too much in the CL already to simply walk away at this point. There is also the Qatar World Cup and the possible ramifications from FIFA who were clearly against the ESL.

There were some massive hurdles for those clubs which probably made it a no go, had they not had those, I don't believe for second they wouldn't have been persuaded to sign up, the same way Chelsea and City were.
 
Last edited:
You're not big fat Sam are you? He's been calling out for us to get punished today.

Here we have our own, calling out for the club to be punished

Answer me this. If we get the punishment you crave, will you sleep with a smile on your face again?
Big fat Sam such an upright and non-duplicitous person.
 
Every trading organisation is in debt: companies owe money to employees, the tax man, suppliers.

City owe money for transfers and a lease on the stadium. This is less than the amounts city are owed from others for transfers, sponsorship, tv, etc.

It’s the net position that matters and city have nothing to worry about on that front, unlike a lot of the others.

thats what i thought was the case.
 
Also to those looking at Bayern and PSG.

Having thought about it, assuming they were offered they would have considered it don't be naive to think they wouldn't. However there are some big factors which separate those clubs from Chelsea and City:

Bayern - Here is the 50+1 rule of the Bundesliga - In order to obtain a license to compete in the Bundesliga, a club must hold a majority of its own voting rights. The rule is designed to ensure that the club's members retain overall control, by way of owning 50% of shares, +1 share, protecting clubs from the influence of external investors.

PSG - They finally have influence with UEFA, they have a seat on the executive board and via beIN their owners have invested too much in the CL already to simply walk away at this point.

There were some massive hurdles for those clubs which probably made it a no go, had they not had those I don't believe for second they wouldn't have been persuaded to sign up the same way Chelsea and City were.
Unlike Bavarians to not sign up for something controversial.
 
You are on cloud cuckoo land if you think that those 12 clubs are equivalent. That ESL plot was openly discussed in the papers at the start of the season. This was the exclusive league that has been mooted a Man Utd and Liverpools attempt to cut City out in case they could not bend UEFA to their will. They messed up on both counts.

Real Madrid, Juve, Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal drove this. City and Chelsea accepted invitations.

There will be no major punishments for Manchester City. We shot the damn thing down when it came to it, and only joined it on the very last day (simon stone, BBC). I don't know exactly what our thinking was. It may have been greed, it may have been subterfuge but it is not the equivalent of Man Utd. Why do you think investment banker Woodward is going, and why did he resign yesterday? His plot. His failure. His defeat.

I can see some minor sanction and censure for City but I'd quite welcome some investigation because our major rivals have much much more to lose than us.

AT worse we're greedy and incompetent because we signed up for something that was doomed. At best we're damned smart. What we aren't is calculating and devious and duplicitous. Ceferin's comments are very understandable

Well done though for arguing a point against a prevailing point of view.
The ESL has been discussed for as long as the Premier League and the Champs League have been going, it’s nothing new. It is why the Champion s League came in to being in place of the old European Cup to placate the old G14. City are proper Jonny come lately s in this . We were involved in it for less than 48 hours. I would be really surprised if there was any sanctions against for this.
 
so 12 clubs can decide they are above everything and everyone and try destroy the structures of the game without consequence?

lads you're on cloud cuckoo land

You're as morally bankrupt as the cunts who dreamed this up if you think this should be excused without punishment

For me it’s not a question of not thinking their shouldn’t be punishment my issue is what rule do you use to punish ?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.