I got two.Maybe they should fax it out, I didn’t receive any! I don’t recall giving the CEO my email address.
Seriously, a statement on the main site for every City fan would have been far more appropriate. Anyway,, we move on.. lessons hopefully learnt, listen to the fans.
8 points!
Something lost in translation? Obviously this is Perez here so it's difficult to take anything at face value but I don't think he means that City planned to destroy the domestic leagues, and what he's alluding to is that City warned all those involved that the Super League format would destroy the domestic leagues. He implies that City were of that opinion from the off and we never really wanted to be a part of such a project (rather than just coming to that realisation when the backlash started), which naturally begs the question why we signed up to it in the first place................I haven't checked if someone's already translated everything Perez said about us so I'll do it here (I speak Spanish)
"There was a club in the English group that weren't that interested. They started to contaminate the others. They signed the document but I don't think they were ever committed. (Interviewer asks whether it's Man City and Perez says he will not say). Because this club pulled out now all of the rest of us have to pull out and leave this project. (Interviewer says that it's interesting that Man City being an elite club can take this decision and back out of something so quickly) The owners of the Manchester team started a campaign, a completely manipulative campaign, to take away the domestic leagues and to not play based on merit. (Then he starts talking about something else)
I don't really get the last part but that's definitely what he says. Quickly and without challenge from the interviewer, he just touches on a Man City (unless "the Manchester team means United??) led plan to take away domestic leagues and then doesn't go into any more detail. Really weird.
FOMOSomething lost in translation? Obviously this is Perez here so it's difficult to take anything at face value but I don't think he means that City planned to destroy the domestic leagues, and what he's alluding to is that City warned all those involved that the Super League format would destroy the domestic leagues. He implies that City were of that opinion from the off and we never really wanted to be a part of such a project (rather than just coming to that realisation when the backlash started), which naturally begs the question why we signed up to it in the first place................
Der Spackel are on the caseHave copies of these contracts been officially released or leaked by anyone yet?