The Super League | FA + PL: New Charter & Fines | UEFA: Settlement

Would you be happy if City joined this European Super League?

  • Yes

    Votes: 109 5.3%
  • No

    Votes: 1,954 94.7%

  • Total voters
    2,063
Perez is off his nut




Boo fucking hoo

Bar this being a crock of shit, if the **** want's to make a profit well don't offer alaba a 5 year deal worth 400k a week or spunk 130M on hazard.

Live within your means and balance the books,

Real started half this shit with their galacticos stupidity decades ago, and rather than trying to monopolise all the money in football, start managing your own, if that means for all these 12 dicks you finsh 5th a few season and don't play in europe or win a trophy, well that's life.

La liga
Bunderliga
Seria A
Here (to an extent)

All would be much better leagues if teams were on an even . penalties for intentional debt creation, or whatever, letting these lot spend and spend then once it bites them on the arse have them try to smash and grab all the money has to stop football shouldn't suffer because of their own mismanagment (RM, rags, scouser, Barca)

Khaldoon said this.
 
Perez is off his nut




Boo fucking hoo

Bar this being a crock of shit, if the **** want's to make a profit well don't offer alaba a 5 year deal worth 400k a week or spunk 130M on hazard.

Live within your means and balance the books,

Real started half this shit with their galacticos stupidity decades ago, and rather than trying to monopolise all the money in football, start managing your own, if that means for all these 12 dicks you finsh 5th a few season and don't play in europe or win a trophy, well that's life.

La liga
Bunderliga
Seria A
Here (to an extent)

All would be much better leagues if teams were on an even keel and competiton returned.


Football at the top needs to reflect on this and FFP and other crazy ideas and say "we have got it wrong" we need to lessen the greed and put in place measures that keep teams financially viable and leagues interesting , whether it is salary caps, penalties for intentional debt creation, or whatever, letting these lot spend and spend then once it bites them on the arse have them try to smash and grab all the money has to stop football shouldn't suffer because of their own mismanagment (RM, rags, scouser, Barca)

The entitlement culture of this cuntish club, spawn of a despotic fascist tyrant is simply staggering
 
Maybe they should fax it out, I didn’t receive any! I don’t recall giving the CEO my email address.
Seriously, a statement on the main site for every City fan would have been far more appropriate. Anyway,, we move on.. lessons hopefully learnt, listen to the fans.
8 points!
 
A few days after this all unfolded Im still wondering what the execs of these clubs were thinking when they all got together and got this idea of a super league written down on the back of a beer mat. Did non of them think about the condemnation they would have got from the supporters of their clubs and also losing the respect and trust of the other teams within their domestic leagues?

They’ve really painted themselves into a corner the historic yank teams in red. The rags thought they could wipe out their debt and make a lot of cash at the same time. I hope this leaves them ostracised within the premier league and all their special favours they get fucked off.
 

This is from the BBC in 1994

'Imagine a world where the very best teams in Europe play each other on a regular basis and viewers pay to watch on TV without regard to the fans who have supported them for decades'

Nah! That could never happen

Newcastle! - well it was 1994, nearly 30 years ago
 
Maybe they should fax it out, I didn’t receive any! I don’t recall giving the CEO my email address.
Seriously, a statement on the main site for every City fan would have been far more appropriate. Anyway,, we move on.. lessons hopefully learnt, listen to the fans.
8 points!
I got two.
You can have one of mine.
 
I haven't checked if someone's already translated everything Perez said about us so I'll do it here (I speak Spanish)

"There was a club in the English group that weren't that interested. They started to contaminate the others. They signed the document but I don't think they were ever committed. (Interviewer asks whether it's Man City and Perez says he will not say). Because this club pulled out now all of the rest of us have to pull out and leave this project. (Interviewer says that it's interesting that Man City being an elite club can take this decision and back out of something so quickly) The owners of the Manchester team started a campaign, a completely manipulative campaign, to take away the domestic leagues and to not play based on merit. (Then he starts talking about something else)



I don't really get the last part but that's definitely what he says. Quickly and without challenge from the interviewer, he just touches on a Man City (unless "the Manchester team means United??) led plan to take away domestic leagues and then doesn't go into any more detail. Really weird.
Something lost in translation? Obviously this is Perez here so it's difficult to take anything at face value but I don't think he means that City planned to destroy the domestic leagues, and what he's alluding to is that City warned all those involved that the Super League format would destroy the domestic leagues. He implies that City were of that opinion from the off and we never really wanted to be a part of such a project (rather than just coming to that realisation when the backlash started), which naturally begs the question why we signed up to it in the first place................
 
Something lost in translation? Obviously this is Perez here so it's difficult to take anything at face value but I don't think he means that City planned to destroy the domestic leagues, and what he's alluding to is that City warned all those involved that the Super League format would destroy the domestic leagues. He implies that City were of that opinion from the off and we never really wanted to be a part of such a project (rather than just coming to that realisation when the backlash started), which naturally begs the question why we signed up to it in the first place................
FOMO
 
I don’t buy the Perez conspiracy theory that this was orchestrated all along, though I like the bit that we we drove pretend Chelsea fans to London to protest.

If it was a plan we would not have signed (like Bayern) and risked Millions on a gamble. This isn’t the way City operate.

However, I do believe that, having seen the fans, players, managers, and then the Government pile in to finish it....City saw an opportunity and were in constant contact with UEFA to plan the exit out and influence the other EPL clubs.

We made the best of a bad job, thought quickly and brought it down.

The interesting thing to me is would it have gone ahead if City were not in it. My guess is still “no“ but I’m glad we were in it as, in the end, we made sure.

I also think we have emerged with more power than before we entered this. We will be UEFAs favourite club right now and the old boys have, in the main, lost a lot of influence. UEFA’s comments as soon as we left were pre-prepared of that I am sure.
 
Last edited:
Project Restart seems to have been forgotten by everyone in the media. The dippers and rags wanted to run the Premier league. When they were told to do one the ESL was dreamt up. I have said before on this thread, this will not go away. They will break from the league cometely. I haven't got a problem with that.... As long as we are not in with them
 
Essentially it all seems to boil down to a handful of clubs thinking they have the right to be the biggest spenders in the game, but at the same time don't want to have to spend so much being that. They're completely incapable of even considering just running like every other club in the world and making financial decisions as to whether they can afford something.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top