SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
#Bantz eh
This has proved, if there was any doubt anyway, HRH was in it purely for the investment opportunity, money makes money.Khaldoon doesn’t do anything on something like this without Mansour’s sign off.
I'll raise you greed and fuckwitery........Shame?
All clubs lost money over the pandemic, that year is an outlier for every business bar none.
City themselves are self-sufficient regardless.
Ignore the tweeter (I know most will) but he's offering an olive branch to City here, we need to take it.
You know - it's not often I feel sorry for multi-millionaire footballers and managers but for once I do. This must be shit for the players and managers at all these clubs as they've clearly not been the ones who have decided this. Sure, they're never going to go skint but money isn't everything and these people are still human beings who have feelings and have effectively been shat on from above.
Spurs probably need the money from this more than any of the other English teams.Hopefully it's both with Spurs following suit soon after.
Couldn't give two shits about the red tops.
City aren’t in debt to Mansour, Chelsea are in debt to Roman (literally and on paper). The two are hugely different.Chelsea and City are also in huge 'debt', not to a bank but to the individuals that own us. You don't think Roman and Sheikh Mansour want some return on that one day? this is a chance to bank hundreds of millions in one go. Exactly the pay day that these men are used to and you think they are going to turn it down?
Same people on here crying about this are also on the transfer forum demanding Haaland, Nuno Mendes, Messi and Mbappe and think Sheikh Mansour should keep pulling his credit card out.