All talk and no trousers. They feel the need to be seen to be doing something
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Super League | FA + PL: New Charter & Fines | UEFA: Settlement
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
hilts
Well-Known Member
A vote by the clubs on any changes preventing clubs trying this again will be interesting. 14 clubs will obviously vote in favour. Let’s see what the other 6 do. It will give us an indication about how sorry they actually are.
Going forward now I can only either see a status quo or a complete breakaway involving more clubs. I don’t see how a European league and a domestic league can happen.
Going forward now I can only either see a status quo or a complete breakaway involving more clubs. I don’t see how a European league and a domestic league can happen.
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 18,406
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
Heavy irony in the fact that the PL was born of a minority of clubs deciding to do whatever they fucking liked to make more money.A vote by the clubs on any changes preventing clubs trying this again will be interesting. 14 clubs will obviously vote in favour. Let’s see what the other 6 do. It will give us an indication about how sorry they actually are.
Going forward now I can only either see a status quo or a complete breakaway involving more clubs. I don’t see how a European league and a domestic league can happen.
There were another 3 slots reserved for others to join. PSG and Munich would have taken two of them pre-launch.Totally agree with your sentiments..However Munich and PSG refused and have credit for doing so..the proposed members would have known this, and without them it was a worthless league..that is what perplexes me, as a superleague without two of the best teams was always meaningless.
As opposed to the football league who wouldn't allow promotion or relegation on merit for the first 98 years.Heavy irony in the fact that the PL was born of a minority of clubs deciding to do whatever they fucking liked to make more money.
Or the FA who banned women's football until fairly recently so it didn't compete with men's.
All football governance is about self interest and about making money, nothing really changed. Even the maximum wage was so the directors could take more money.
I have to say, I have no sympathy for vile, elitist rags because self-entitlement and deluded vanity is at the heart of their mentality. But football needs better regulation to prevent predators like the Glaziers from the asset stripping that's been going on at Old Toilet for the last 15 years. I wouldn't want it to happen to my club.
What about a 16 point deduction for each club?All talk and no trousers. They feel the need to be seen to be doing something
Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
Funny how all the pundits being wheeled out by Sky are united, liverpool and arsenal ex-players all of who have had their noses put out of joint by our emergence.
I guarantee these rules about to be introduced by the PL will not tackle debt but will attack owner investment.
I guarantee these rules about to be introduced by the PL will not tackle debt but will attack owner investment.
Heavy irony in the fact that the PL was born of a minority of clubs deciding to do whatever they fucking liked to make more money.
Spot on and in the first twelve years only Blackburn, with Jack Walkers money, broke the United and Arsenal monopoly until Chelsea and ourselves with new owners money could compete.