Not really no, because they still had a game in hand, even if we had beaten forest.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Not really no, because they still had a game in hand, even if we had beaten forest.
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,480
That may be your opinion I suppose ,in my opinion a wrong one, not stupid, but wrong.Oh well done you.
They are effectively 5 points ahead. Debate the language all you want, assume what you want, but while they have a game in hand, calling it 2 points ahead is both wrong and stupid.
That may be your opinion I suppose ,in my opinion a wrong one, not stupid, but wrong.
It might indeed be stupid. But it is not wrong. Unless you can see an alternate world in which they only have 37 games to play.
Of course its wrong, 2 points ahead and 0,1 or 3 points to play for isn,t "effectively 5 points ahead". Anything can happen from here on in, and we are "effectively" in with a shout. :-)That may be your opinion I suppose ,in my opinion a wrong one, not stupid, but wrong.
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer
Well-Known Member
I always follow @gordondaviesmoustache blindly, thus I can envisage 14 wins from here on in :)
Never discount this club, if we’ve learnt anything over the years it’s expect the unexpected
Im going the treble and stripped of 2 of them post season end; only to win on appeal in 2025 (:
Never discount this club, if we’ve learnt anything over the years it’s expect the unexpected
Im going the treble and stripped of 2 of them post season end; only to win on appeal in 2025 (:
Tangled up in blue.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 May 2021
- Messages
- 4,044
- Team supported
- Man city
Nurse !!City will win the title by 19 pts
Father Paul
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 4,394
They have a game in hand we know that but they don't have the points in the bag yet and they might lose that game. What is selective about that. It is an advantage but not a certainty.Oh well done you.
They are effectively 5 points ahead. Debate the language all you want, assume what you want, but while they have a game in hand, calling it 2 points ahead is just being selective, and wrong.
Brightwell Bros.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 7,582
Lol, you're also making assumptions about points that will be won or lost in games yet to be played.I'm counting them 12 points behind, but that means fuck all when the reality is they are effectively 5 points ahead.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.