SkyBlueFlux
Well-Known Member
How many league titles is it going to take until we have "history"?
I don't understand. We have been dominant for 10 years now in the league, will we only be classed as having history 20 years from now because a certain amount of time has to pass before it's classed as "history"?
It's mental.
Mate, we won our first FA Cup 120 years ago and our first league trophy nearly 90 years ago. We won our first major European silverware before Liverpool won any of theirs. We have always been in the top two divisions of English football with the exception of one season. If we have no history then neither does basically the entire English League.
The reason they say we have no history has nothing to do with winning things or being around for a long time. They are using the word history as a euphemism for "old money". We are a club rich in history, but we weren't rich monetarily until 2008. It's the class system but for football clubs plain and simple and we have the temerity of not being part of the landed gentry.
So to answer your question, we could probably win trophies and make a net profit using our own funds for the next 50 years and they will still trot out this argument. What they're actually saying is "you are not worthy because you were raised poor" and they'll say the same of Newcastle.
There is some hope that with enough time people's opinions will stop being so ignorant but I won't hold my breath.