The Tottenham Thread 13/14 part 3.

[MJepsenJensen]

So Silva's out for our game apparently, A shame... Nasri always scores against us!

 

[Crouchinho]

So Silva's out for our game apparently, A shame... Nasri always scores against us!

I'm more worried about Aguero's form!

 

[mancitymick]

So what is that in a pie chart. CL games you have been to especially

How many City games do you get to, as you're based in Belgium?

Got ya. Still have a house in Manchester. Still have a season ticket and was there on Tuesday. Don't take me on with not being In the UK and going to games

He suddenly went of line when I posted this.

 

[stony]

How many City games do you get to, as you're based in Belgium?

Got ya. Still have a house in Manchester. Still have a season ticket and was there on Tuesday. Don't take me on with not being In the UK and going to games

He suddenly went of line when I posted this.

That's no surprise, he's only here to troll. Despite the other spurs fans sticking up for him, he is the cause of all the strife in this thread. It's more than a bit rich to complain about a thread being de-railed by arguments and then stick up for the main protagonist. If you go on another teams forum then you have to learn to bite your tongue. TFHC6061 is incapable of doing this and goes out of his way to piss people off. He's obviously a fairly bright bloke, and I refuse to believe that someone as bright as that can be oblivious to the shit he stirs on here. He's a troll and this place, and this thread would be all the better if he was permanently banned.

 

[Ric]

I knew you would pop up. No matter how much shit you say to me I won't go anywhere. So wind your neck in

He's not wrong as regards 6061 though, is he?

I have defended him, I said previously he will bite back if people want to goad him

There have been genuine posts by city fans regarding spurs, but it gets lost amongst all the bickering quotes back and forth. There have been 3 parts and it's all arguing.

It's a fantastic forum but this thread doesn't paint it in a good light. People calling each other *****, fuckers etc rather than some good football talk.

I usually enjoy this thread, and there are some really good Spurs posters on the forum. There's obviously a bit of animosity from both sides, but it does seem like one or two posters are being deliberately provocative. It's a shame if they end up banned as a result.

 

[mancitymick]

He's not wrong as regards 6061 though, is he?

I have defended him, I said previously he will bite back if people want to goad him

There have been genuine posts by city fans regarding spurs, but it gets lost amongst all the bickering quotes back and forth. There have been 3 parts and it's all arguing.

It's a fantastic forum but this thread doesn't paint it in a good light. People calling each other *****, fuckers etc rather than some good football talk.

I usually enjoy this thread, and there are some really good Spurs posters on the forum. There's obviously a bit of animosity from both sides, but it does seem like one or two posters are being deliberately provocative. It's a shame if they end up banned as a result.

Ric, fair enough. The only problem is he-she fails to answer when questions when he is still on line, or when not go back to when online and reply

 

[Ric]

I have defended him, I said previously he will bite back if people want to goad him

There have been genuine posts by city fans regarding spurs, but it gets lost amongst all the bickering quotes back and forth. There have been 3 parts and it's all arguing.

It's a fantastic forum but this thread doesn't paint it in a good light. People calling each other *****, fuckers etc rather than some good football talk.

I usually enjoy this thread, and there are some really good Spurs posters on the forum. There's obviously a bit of animosity from both sides, but it does seem like one or two posters are being deliberately provocative. It's a shame if they end up banned as a result.

Ric, fair enough. The only problem is he-she fails to answer when questions when he is still on line, or when not go back to when online and reply

Fair point, but equally he's not obliged to reply - that's not a breach of the rules in itself.

 

[mancitymick]

Granted, but any decent poster would / should go back to when last on and answer questions posed

 

[Bilboblue]

I usually enjoy this thread, and there are some really good Spurs posters on the forum. There's obviously a bit of animosity from both sides, but it does seem like one or two posters are being deliberately provocative. It's a shame if they end up banned as a result.

Ric, fair enough. The only problem is he-she fails to answer when questions when he is still on line, or when not go back to when online and reply

Fair point, but equally he's not obliged to reply - that's not a breach of the rules in itself.

Being a troll is though Ric.

There are some decent spuds on here that we have good banter with, 6061 however, is a complete and utter **** (not gonna risk another warning for that twunt)

he adds nothing to this thread, let's face it, we are interested in the views of opposition fans, not how many times spurs have played whoever they are up against on a given week, or who played for both clubs, etc. etc. ad nauseum. It has NO relevance to City-Spuds and should be fked off to the websites/forums between the two teams playing.

I'm all for DECENT opposition posters, of which we have gained many, but I think it says a lot when even his own fellow fans say he is a wind-up merchant.

 

[jimharri]

I usually enjoy this thread, and there are some really good Spurs posters on the forum. There's obviously a bit of animosity from both sides, but it does seem like one or two posters are being deliberately provocative. It's a shame if they end up banned as a result.

Ric, fair enough. The only problem is he-she fails to answer when questions when he is still on line, or when not go back to when online and reply

Fair point, but equally he's not obliged to reply - that's not a breach of the rules in itself.

He needs banning Monsieur Ric; or is calling our owner a despot permissible? I'm all in favour of free speech, but with it comes a responsibility not to make comments without backing it up with hard facts. As it happens, I've been told that he has already been banned three times this year, yet has been allowed back on each time. Shirley, you and/or the mods have realised by now that he's the sort of person who'd start an argument in an empty room?

 

[BlueHammer85]

Keep him. Makes me hate spurs even more

 

[bleed.blue]

Chickening out of a discussion when shown the facts does not warrant a ban.

 

[Ducado]

No problem with most of the opposition fans on here they all seem to be sound posters who really know and like their football they are also very respectful, the guy we are talking about just does not realise that he is boring I think he might be getting the message now

 

[fac63]

No problem with most of the opposition fans on here they all seem to be sound posters who really know and like their football they are also very respectful, the guy we are talking about just does not realise that he is boring I think he might be getting the message now

I don't know what the rules of banning anyone are, but as a Spurs' fan, I find him pedantic and insufferable. So much so that I avoid this thread when he's in full voice here.

 

[Ducado]

No problem with most of the opposition fans on here they all seem to be sound posters who really know and like their football they are also very respectful, the guy we are talking about just does not realise that he is boring I think he might be getting the message now

I don't know what the rules of banning anyone are, but as a Spurs' fan, I find him pedantic and insufferable. So much so that I avoid this thread when he's in full voice here.

I think he just needed to be told to pipe down a bit, it would be boring if he were a City fan doing the same thing, there is a difference between debate and banter and bombarding us with facts and figures that can be read in some many different ways.

Anyway how do you think you will fair against Newcastle, they are very bad away for home I think it will be 3-0

 

[AntonDonJuan]

Whats the craic with Soldado? I saw some posts comparing him and Negredo about who got the better deal, seams a no brainer at the minute. And he has a big nose

 

[carlos tevez is a blue]

No problem with most of the opposition fans on here they all seem to be sound posters who really know and like their football they are also very respectful, the guy we are talking about just does not realise that he is boring I think he might be getting the message now

I don't know what the rules of banning anyone are, but as a Spurs' fan, I find him pedantic and insufferable. So much so that I avoid this thread when he's in full voice here.

I think he just needed to be told to pipe down a bit, it would be boring if he were a City fan doing the same thing, there is a difference between debate and banter and bombarding us with facts and figures that can be read in some many different ways.

Anyway how do you think you will fair against Newcastle, they are very bad away for home I think it will be 3-0

3 Soldado penos?

 

[THFC6061]

Whats the craic with Soldado? I saw some posts comparing him and Negredo about who got the better deal, seams a no brainer at the minute. And he has a big nose

I wouldn't disagree with that at the moment, although Soldado's goals have all been vitally important for the points Spurs have won to a much greater extent than Negredo's goals for City.

But they're both very good players comparing their respective transfer deals would seem a little bit premature.

 

[AwayDay]

I don't think you can compare Negredo and Soldado without bearing in mind the midfields they play in front of. Negredo gets around 4 chances a game, Soldado gets 4 chances a month. When they were In Spain I thought that Soldado was better, but maybe Negredo is more suited to the English game, Soldado is not a target man, hes the Spanish Defoe. Pure finisher but needs the service.

 

[City Raider]

Whats the craic with Soldado? I saw some posts comparing him and Negredo about who got the better deal, seams a no brainer at the minute. And he has a big nose

I wouldn't disagree with that at the moment, although Soldado's goals have all been vitally important for the points Spurs have won to a much greater extent than Negredo's goals for City.

But they're both very good players comparing their respective transfer deals would seem a little bit premature.

from what i've seen there isn't much doubt that spurs would have scored more goals with negredo in the team than soldado, he's much more the type you need when playing only 1 up top

as for how many soldado would have scored for city? who knows, i suppose we've had a few pens ;)