yido in briefs said:
Well, again, I think it's pretty embarrassing that they can only attain that while being propped up by said Russian oligarch. Highly embarrassing in fact.
Although I doubt I'll find many City fans in agreement with me there seeing as you have had to spend more of other people’s money than anyone else in the history of the game just to be a competitive club.
Spending since Premier League inception to 2010;
Chelsea= £366m (3 PL, 3 CC, 5 FA Cup, 3 Charity Shields)
(City is second with just over £300m but its disproportional data considering the length of time they've been spending.)
Liverpool = £201m (1 CL, 3 FA Cups, 3 CC)
Tottenham = £176m (2 CC)
Manchester United = £139m (12 PL, 4 FA Cup, 4 CC, 9 Charity Shields, 2 CL)
Arsenal = £32m (3 PL, 5 FA Cup, 1 CC, 4 Charity Shields)
Spot the odd man out. The holier than though attitude and bitterness for clubs that actually use their resources well is what makes most of you a bunch of pricks. Sure, you're spending and wage plan is lower than a lot of us. And even taking out United, why has Arsenal outperformed you by such a massive margin while spending a fraction of what you have? I'd love to hear the excuse because that IS fucking embarrassing for anyone who wants to walk around spouting nonsense like that. For a club with the 4th highest net spend in the country (at least since the PL inception) you're pretty much living in a glass house.