dronefromsector7G
Well-Known Member
You’d think on +1 they would’ve corrected their mistakeJust watching on itv +1 both as think as pig shit lol
Last edited:
You’d think on +1 they would’ve corrected their mistakeJust watching on itv +1 both as think as pig shit lol
You’d think on on +1 they would’ve corrected their mistake
Unbelievable mateMy missus use to get in an hour after me so I would watch The Chase on ITV than we would watch it on ITV +1 together. I would get alot of the questions right and my missus thought I was dead brainy.
I keeped this up for about a year but than both my lad and me couldnt keep a straight face any longer !
Unbelievable mate
Ha ha brilliant.My missus use to get in an hour after me so I would watch The Chase on ITV than we would watch it on ITV +1 together. I would get alot of the questions right and my missus thought I was dead brainy.
I keeped this up for about a year but than both my lad and me couldnt keep a straight face any longer !
So the smart thing would be to double bluff, interesting.To be fair, the Chase producers can either make or break contestants.
According to a colleaue who went on the show, on the application (no, I've not been on it) you are asked to mention your strong topics and topics you know nothing about.
So in the actual show the questions could be related to your stronger topics or all related to topics you know nothing about hence why some folk look awful..
Reminds me of a story from the early days of the lotteryHa ha brilliant.
I used to do a similar thing with antiques roadshow, my misses at the time thought I was fucking lovejoy, given that I used to value every item within a few quid of the expert. Throw in a few references to where it was made and what period, just before he does, and boom lol.