gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
citykev28 said:
Tell that to the non-smoking staff who develop lung cancer from passive smoking.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The UK Smoking Ban
- Thread starter mcmanus
- Start date
Tell that to the non-smoking staff who develop lung cancer from passive smoking.
mcmanus
Well-Known Member
I sort of agree with you Citykev.
At the time of the ban I think most pubs would have opted to allow smoking but with people being use to it now I reckon a lot would stay smoke free. Therefore giving everyone the option
At the time of the ban I think most pubs would have opted to allow smoking but with people being use to it now I reckon a lot would stay smoke free. Therefore giving everyone the option
Bill
Moderator
the best piece of legislation ever passed by parliment.
well done tony and gord, you actually did something right.
well done tony and gord, you actually did something right.
Meester Pees
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 256
gordondaviesmoustache said:citykev28 said:still think that if a pub doesn't serve food, it should be allowed to choose whether to enforce the smoking ban.
Tell that to the non-smoking staff who develop lung cancer from passive smoking.
Bullshit. Does the phenomena of passive smoking even exist? I've got my doubts. Tragic though his death was, I reckon Roy Castle was a statistical anomoly.
Bill
Moderator
Meester Pees said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Tell that to the non-smoking staff who develop lung cancer from passive smoking.
Bullshit. Does the phenomena of passive smoking even exist? I've got my doubts. Tragic though his death was, I reckon Roy Castle was a statistical anomoly.
doesn't matter if its true or not it great that it is always added to the argument.
my self i think you err on the side of caution and fuck smoking off just in case.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Meester Pees said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Tell that to the non-smoking staff who develop lung cancer from passive smoking.
Bullshit. Does the phenomena of passive smoking even exist? I've got my doubts. Tragic though his death was, I reckon Roy Castle was a statistical anomoly.
In actual fact I believe that Roy Castle was due to a genetic pre-disposition (which was not related to passive smoking)
Notwithstanding that I fail to see how inhaling something that has been proven to give you cancer (albeit in attenuated form) can be anything other than harmful.
Meester Pees
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 256
de niro said:Meester Pees said:Bullshit. Does the phenomena of passive smoking even exist? I've got my doubts. Tragic though his death was, I reckon Roy Castle was a statistical anomoly.
doesn't matter if its true or not it great that it is always added to the argument.
my self i think you err on the side of caution and fuck smoking off just in case.
Well ok, but then fuck cars off and factory chimneys and anything else that emits fumes - We'll have no double standards here.
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
In a strange way i miss the hazy mist of the pub. Was for me a very normal thing when i smoked and also when i didnt. Im not saying it was right but pubs seemed right when it was hazy with smoke. Saying that i aint missed it and i dont think anyone has including the smokers. Smoking outside has also formed a new community outside clubs and pubs. Overall it is the right thing and a good thing but i will always miss that hazy mist when walking into a pub
Meester Pees
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 256
gordondaviesmoustache said:Meester Pees said:Bullshit. Does the phenomena of passive smoking even exist? I've got my doubts. Tragic though his death was, I reckon Roy Castle was a statistical anomoly.
In actual fact I believe that Roy Castle was due to a genetic pre-disposition (which was not related to passive smoking)
Notwithstanding that I fail to see how inhaling something that has been proven to give you cancer (albeit in attenuated form) can be anything other than harmful.
It almost certainly is harmful - But why single out smoking when there's car fumes, Chernoble shite in the water table etc..seems like bollox to me.
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
Meester Pees said:de niro said:doesn't matter if its true or not it great that it is always added to the argument.
my self i think you err on the side of caution and fuck smoking off just in case.
Well ok, but then fuck cars off and factory chimneys and anything else that emits fumes - We'll have no double standards here.
Yeah but same people who were so vocal about it dont walk around Cities with face masks on! If they were that worried they would of but its always better to kick the smokers and since they done that its now kick the drivers. These people wont be happy till they live in woods again eating leaves